User talk:Women2.0

Women 2.0
Thank you for your message. I have restored the article and reverted to an older version before you made your changes.

Regardless of whether Women 2.0 sells any products, the tone of the material you added to the article was purely promotional.

If you wish to expand the article, please add only what has been written about Women 2.0 in reliable sources.

First, however, you should read our guideline concerning conflicts of interest. If you work for Women 2.0, you may not be able to write impartially about your employer.

Also, please register an account for yourself. Under our username policy, users should not edit under the names of companies or groups.

Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:38, 12 August 2011 (UTC)


 * No, by reliable sources we generally mean sources that are independent of the subject, such as books and newspaper and magazine articles. You can quote the Women 2.0 website to say the group describes themselves as x, y, and z, but that's it. And you can't copy and paste text from any website without permission. That's a copyright violation. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:29, 12 August 2011 (UTC)