User talk:Womenwiki2050

April 2024
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Liang Wang (oboist), you may be blocked from editing. AbsoluteWissen (talk) 02:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)


 * these allegations are unsubstantiated. it is libel. Womenwiki2050 (talk) 02:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * refer to standards for living persons? Womenwiki2050 (talk) 02:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * "If an allegation or incident is noteworthy, relevant, and well documented, it belongs in the article—even if it is negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it." AbsoluteWissen (talk) 02:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Allegations are unsubstantiated by nature. They only merit inclusion in article when they become noteworthy. If Wang's colleagues had not issued a statement saying they believe the allegations are true, I would side with you that it is best not to include them in the article.Trumpetrep (talk) 02:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'll take a look at their statement. Womenwiki2050 (talk) 03:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Edit Warring
Hi Womenwiki2050! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Liang Wang several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Sadly, the allegations are part of the public domain and should probably be in the article..