User talk:Wonderful Web

June 2019
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. 331dot (talk) 11:48, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

, the edits don't seem all that bad to me. They weren't "really helpful", but not blatant spam either - what one might expect of a high school student, not of a marketing person. Would you object to an unblock if Wonderful Web - then Alexander 101 - agrees to review our verifiability policy as well as WP:Identifying reliable sources? Huon (talk) 02:28, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
 * My thought was that it was a marketing agency representing the school; if you are satisfied, however, that's fine with me. 331dot (talk) 07:17, 2 July 2019 (UTC)