User talk:Wongco1112/sandbox

Review #1 The sections are very well detailed and are very well diversified to give the reader a good, all around understanding of the chemical. Although the sections are excellent work, the chem box needs a little touching up. Add more information, facts, and organize the chem box as well as adding in a picture. You may also want to add a ball and stick picture if you choose to do so. Also reference your chem box showing where you got that information from. I would also add in a few word links to other wiki pages and I would also expand on the effects of the safety hazard from containing mutagen properties. Also see if you can add in diagrams and pictures depicting the synthesis reaction as it was shown in Spiropyran. Job well done so far, excellent work! (Aradi7 (talk) 23:48, 31 October 2012 (UTC))

Review #2 First off, you did a great job with the sections. They are extremely detailed and provide a great amount of information. When reading the sections, you are able to get a good grasp of the Choloropentaaminecobalt (III) Chloride. As far as the sections go, keep looking for more information. Besides that, it looks really good. However, the chembox needs a little more work. More information needs to be added to the chembox. Make it so that you do not have to click on a link to look at the pictures. Also, see if you can find more identifiers for this compound. In addition, make the other names sections a bit more aesthetically pleasing. Overall, just try to find more information for the chembox. Besides the suggestions I made above, your wikipedia page looks great and keep up the good job!

(Dgraber2 (talk) 19:53, 1 November 2012 (UTC))

Review #3

First off, there's a lot of good here. You need to include an image of your molecule. I imagine the picture you have is copyrighted material from somebody's paper. Try to make one of your own using marvinsketch or jmol or a similar program. Also, your history section is detailed but choppy. It reads relatively awkwardly, you need to work on the flow of that section. The rest of it is great, the chembox also needs more information. Good job!

(Lchtnst2 (talk) 19:53, 1 November 2012 (UTC))