User talk:WoodDraw

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Sarcasticidealist (talk) 20:46, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

David Vitter
Hello. I am glad to see you join Wikipedia. I do have an issue however. I added this edit, and in which you deleted it. I have reverted this. However, if you feel it should be removed again, I would like to hear why. I belive that this is a story which should go here because it is a newsworthy story. I am always willing to listen and communicate in order to help this project. I would urge you to respond on my talk page, where we can discuss it. Thanks and good luck here on Wikipedia!!America69 (talk) 00:13, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello again. I went back, and looked at the David Vitter talk page. I saw your comments, and have reverted my edit reverting yours. If, and I am looking, I find another source, as in CNN, MSNBC, or Fox News, would you be willing to re-add this. Thanks. America69 (talk) 00:19, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Wow, that was quick. On CNN, the article also seems to suggest that this could be "blown up". I am now backing off until we find more info. Good work on finding that. Thanks. America69 (talk) 00:24, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem. I also agree we should wait until we know what happens. There are two sides, and I guess we wait to find out which is true. =)America69 (talk) 01:43, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the revert -- I'm out (3 max in a 24 hour period), so I am hanging back except to participate in the discussion. &#8756; Therefore cogito·sum 21:51, 12 March 2009 (UTC)