User talk:Woodenpig

Disambiguation link notification for December 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joanne the Scammer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heritage ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Joanne_the_Scammer check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Joanne_the_Scammer?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Roscoe's House of Chicken and Waffles
I've reverted your deletion of the New York Times reference. While how it is presented in the article may be a bit undue, it seems to be a noteworthy point of view that shouldn't be removed completely. --Ronz (talk) 18:16, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Understood. Thanks for the correction! Woodenpig (talk) 20:38, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks! What about ? --Ronz (talk) 21:07, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * F - my bad. Won't happen again. Sorry about that. I just remembered you said not to cite Famous Birthdays. You can take that out. Woodenpig (talk) 21:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Instagram
Hi. Per MOS:OVERLINK, we should not link to common words like Instagram. You don't want to send readers clicking away from articles with links to common words, place names and concepts. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:23, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Got it, thanks! Woodenpig (talk) 17:27, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:32, 18 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Hey! No worries. Thanks for correcting that. Woodenpig (talk) 16:39, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

What happened
Hi. I've deleted your sandbox page. Although it looked like the tag was added properly, it was not - it was not included in the category which admins patrol in order to delete stuff. I'm not entirely sure but I suspect you used instead of just. So now you know. -- zzuuzz (talk) 03:12, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Wow - thanks so much! I've also been meaning to get rid of this one as well since I added too much to this draft. If you could help that would be A-MAZING. Woodenpig (talk) 03:49, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Tender Greens for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tender Greens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tender Greens until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 00:38, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to John Stamos. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  02:38, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tender Greens Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Tender Greens Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Wooden Pig.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wooden Pig.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)