User talk:Woodinville

Well, I guess you can drop me a note if you want to discuss my comments on the various MPEG audio algorithms.

Join the discussion
Since you encountered a problem with User:OscarJuan's edits which you reverted for lack of notability and possible violations to WP:V. Maybe you should express an opinion at another article created by his associate and himself at the Audicom AfD.
 * Dear Woodinville, I had been investigating the claims of the user and found that he has actually made a contribution to the history of broadcast automation by creating one of the first (if not the first) broadcast automation software. The algorithm has been documented by the Audio Engineering Society, although a patent does not exist. You may want to search the site with keyword "Oscar Bonello". Therefore, as per WP:AGF, I had to withdraw my nomination delete said article and in effect, I am going to help edit it up to WP standards. I urge you to forgive this user's past interactions with you and to dismiss it as cultural indifferences. Thanks very much anyway for your comments. Best regards, Jrod2 (talk) 18:38, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I am not sure where you read that, but according to the AES, he does appear to have created the first software/hardware solution for broadcast automation. Jrod2 (talk) 20:22, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Bonello's comment

Probably I was not clear about my claims. I never said to be the "inventor of perceptual audio coding". Please review all the information that I gave to Wikipedia and you do not find that statement. The only claim I have is that my team and I have been developed the "first commercially available bit compression device running on PC" That is my only claim. Do not agree with that ? Please Mr Woodinville, I will be very happy if I have an agreement with Gabriel and you. We are all gentlemans and university and research people. Please, since I prefer not to edit anything at MP3 page, I ask you and Gabril to place the text that in your opinion best describes my work. Only that. Is it possible for you ? Best regards OscarJuan (talk)OscarJuanOscarJuan (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 03:59, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

MP3 limitations
Would you mind leaving a comment in the thread at Talk:MP3, to better explain why you feel the citation-needed tag isn't needed, and possibly stave off a reappearance of the tag? I offered my own point of view (that citations are needed, just not with any urgency since the material isn't controversial, and I don't mind if it's tagged or untagged) and I pointed out that the Brandenburg paper really only supports one of the items in our list. We should cite MP3'Tech though since that seems to be the basis of some of the other items in the list. Thanks —mjb (talk) 07:20, 21 December 2010 (UTC)