User talk:Woodstock in Bangock

Fair use rationale for Image:FashionRocks.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:FashionRocks.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:59, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Christina Aguilera appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. '' ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ ―Œ  ♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣  14:17, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
For some reason I can't see why, you changed the article on Christina Aguilera back to a previous incorrect version. I spend time and effort trying to get it rid of typo's, POV, correct grammar, and correct use of capital letters. Please check twice before you edit in the future. -- Soetermans |  drop me a line  |  what I'd do now?  14:07, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Now I see why, your contributions are only on Aguilera. Please take a step back once in a while to see what could be done on that article, istead of simply taking it all off again. -- Soetermans |  drop me a line  |  what I'd do now?  14:09, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Christina Aguilera
Please see for how the discography style on the page should look like: WikiProject Musicians/Article guidelines. And the way the music section is, is perfectly fine. With all of them in one section, the title is too long, and the years expand too long. They have enough information to be on their own. ΣПDiПG–STΛЯT  (Talk)  02:26, 21 October 2010 (UTC)


 * The titles were ALWAYS like that, really? Why don't you see this edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christina_Aguilera&diff=383143260&oldid=382455628 and try to tell me that. I changed it to that, and noticed it was too long, so I put it into 2 different sections. Quit changing it. It is perfectly fine the way it is. ΣПDiПG–STΛЯT   (Talk)  21:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Christina Aguilera. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:20, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I have no idea what the content issues are, because this is not an area I have interest in, but I have seen your edit summaries crop up on my Watchlist. I recommend you tone it down, try to be friendly and constructive - if you talk "like a jerk" you will be treated like one. If you have constructive changes to make then make them nicely. --Errant[tmorton166] $(chat!)$ 18:24, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * It was in the edit summary on the page. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:25, 22 October 2010 (UTC)