User talk:Wool Mintons/Archive 1

Welcome to Wikipedia
John Vandenberg (chat) 03:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Film project welcome
 Welcome! Hey, welcome to WikiProject Films! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films, awards, festivals, filmmaking, and film characters. If you haven't already, please add User WikiProject Films to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:
 * Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].


 * The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for June has been published.  July's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:


 * Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
 * Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Announcements template to see how you can help.
 * Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia.  Check it out!

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Collectonian -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 03:29, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Film infobox
Please keep in mind two things - flag icons are not used in the infobox, and the release date should follow the format used in the country where the film was made, i.e. July 30, 2009 for the US, 30 July 2009 for the UK, Australia, and other countries that use that format. Have fun! MovieMadness (talk) 14:56, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Actually, three things! Under Starring in the infobox, don't list everyone in the cast - limit it to the key players, otherwise the infobox will be very long. MovieMadness (talk) 15:00, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi! Being new, instead of finding the actual infobox template, I copied the template from another page, which had the flag as well as the UK date style, oops! I also used the Tea for Two trailer title because it was in public domain, and therefore didn't have to deal with the fair use rationale, even though the poster obviously fits better in it! Thanks for the tips, though, they really help :) Wool Mintons (talk) 06:03, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films July 2009 Newsletter
The July 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:22, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films August 2009 Newsletter
The August 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:26, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

WP:FILM September Election Voting
The September 2009 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next six months; members can still nominate themselves if interested. Please vote here by September 28! This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:31, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films September 2009 Newsletter
The September 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:42, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

WP:FILMS October Newsletter
The October 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. The newsletter includes details on the current membership roll call to readd your name from the inactive list to the active list. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

1930s category films
Hi Wool! May I ask about your edits you made to some 1930s pages? Specificaly, why did you remove the 1930s horror films cat and 1930s comedy film cat from the page for The Old Dark House? These categories are used to help not get category:comedy films and category:horror films too overcrowded. I look forward to your reply! Andrzejbanas (talk) 08:08, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The film is a comedy horror film, isn't it? (From what I read in the lead it said humorous dialogue as well as being a horror film.) It was already listed as a comedy horror film, which I feel was more specific than the two categories separately. I removed them because it felt redundant to have those listed in addition to comedy horror. From my readings on categories in WP:FILM, it says to put them in the most specific categories, which in this case would be 1930s comedy horror films, but as that doesn't exist yet, wouldn't comedy horror be the best? Wool Mintons (talk) 08:19, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * True, but since there aren't enough comedy horror films in the 1930s, (under ten of them by my knowledge) it's still useful to have 1930s horror films and 1930s comedy films in that category. It still has some straight ahead comedy scenes that don't relate to the horror proceedings such as the whole "have a potato" jokes at the dinner table in the movie. And it also has some straight ahead horror scenes such as the whole battle with Sol at the end. Do you think it would be alright to bring back those cats? :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:08, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry it took so long to get back to you! I replaced the categories. :) I think I was just on a roll from editing the romantic comedy categories that were still under romance films and comedy films (and with no mention of romantic comedy in their categories even though they're clearly stated to be romcoms in their leads!) and should have stayed away from articles where they just dabble in other genres. Thanks! Wool Mintons (talk) 05:42, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

To Catch a Thief
Not sure why you took down the category Romance Films. There is a spectacular romance between the two stars. What's your thinking? --Ring Cinema (talk) 16:04, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm changed it to 1950s romance films, I didn't remove romance films completely. :) Wool Mintons (talk) 20:16, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Film infobox
Hi. I've noticed in some of your edits you've replaced the with United States. The former auto-populates the country category, which is one of the 3 primary categories all films should be categorized by. These templates have been set up to do three things 1) replace the flags in the infobox, 2)link to the countries' "cinema of" article and 3)auto-populate the country category (in the same way "English" in the language field in the infobox also auto-populates). Thanks.  Lugnuts  (talk) 17:56, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I do have a question about this, then. The reason I was changing them to the link was because the MOS suggests putting the categories in alphabetical order, and with the template automatically placing American films and English-language films at the front of the list of cats, that's sort of impossible. Do you think I should ignore the MOS on this and stick with the template? Thanks for any help! Wool Mintons (talk) 10:10, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

WP:FILMS November Newsletter
The November 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:13, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Film categories
Why did you remove the "Romance films" category from Prudence and the Pill? It's obviously about romance (and sex). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Codrdan (talk • contribs) 00:49, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It's also a comedy (as stated in the lead). Therefore, romantic comedy, which is what I changed it to (well, the even more specific 1960s romantic comedy films). Which also means it shouldn't be lumped in with the romance films and the comedy films, as per WP:FILM most specific cats. Romantic comedies are sub-cats of both romance films and comedy films, and according to that, it shouldn't be placed in the two parent categories. :) Wool Mintons (talk) 01:43, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Romance on the High Seas - Title.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Romance on the High Seas - Title.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:43, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films December 2009 Newsletter
The December 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Films January 2010 Newsletter
The January 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:47, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Duplicate categorization
Hi WM, this is a response to your deletion of a category entry in Get Over It (film). I restored the entry, following the duplicate-categorization rule. I don't know whether there's a consensus on the issue right now, but I agree with one other user that readers who want to see all the pages in a category often expect to see them on one page. Please join the conversation at Wikipedia_talk:Categorization. Thanks. PS: Your description of 2000s romantic comedy films as "non-distinguished" is incorrect. 2000s romantic comedy films are obviously distinguished from other romantic comedy films by being produced in the 2000s. Please comment in the "Inclusion" discussion that I linked above. &mdash;Codrdan (talk) 06:50, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd much rather comment here first. You say it's incorrect. Under the categorization section WP:FILM, the example is listed under 2000s comedy films, not comedy films. It doesn't list comedy films at all. The romantic comedy category can be systematically broken down into decades, as it has been done. Every romantic comedy film can fit into one of those subcats. If they weren't broken into those subcats, the category would be enormous. With your 'correction', that leaves that film as the only film remaining in the romantic comedy films category. Something like "American silent film actors" is a distinguished category, as you can't categorize everyone else into "American sound film actors." 2000s romantic comedy films isn't a distinguished category, because you can categorize everything that doesn't fit into it in another similar category. Not to mention that if someone were browsing the category, wouldn't it be easier and less cluttered to look under the decades? If someone is trying to remember the name of an old romantic comedy, they only have to look through a few subcats to find it instead of wading through nearly 1200 films simply listed there. Wool Mintons (talk) 08:31, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Peter Lawford combined years
I very much like the look of this but I wonder -- it's hard enough to get many editors to make additions to tables correctly. The rowspan will just make it harder. Since the movies shown are only a fraction of his total, the list will inevitably grow. Is this a place where we should sacrifice elegance for ease of editing?. . . . Jim. . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 11:46, 17 February 2010 (UTC) (If you chose to respond, please do so here.)
 * While I understand what you mean, combining the years is actually what WP:ACTOR supports. The filmography table sample has the years combined. Wool Mintons (talk) 14:33, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Category deletion
Category:American films states "For convenience, all American films are included in this category. This includes all American films that can also be found in the subcategories." Clarityfiend (talk) 09:35, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Films February 2010 Newsletter
The February 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:39, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Angels with Dirty Faces
Thanks for your explanation, that makes total sense. I have a bit of a blind-spot when it comes to categories; I never use them so I usually work on the crude principle of the more the merrier. Sub-cats are obviously sensible, so thanks for your work on this! Ged UK  09:39, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Films March 2010 Newsletter
The March 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:50, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hellofriscohelloposter.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Hellofriscohelloposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:51, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:13th Academy Awards poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:13th Academy Awards poster.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:33, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS April Newsletter
The April 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 23:02, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS May 2010 Newsletter
The May 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:56, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:57, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS June 2010 Newsletter
The June 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:38, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Removing obsolete parameters with AWB
Hi. From the AWB guidance page the rules of use state "Don't edit too quickly; consider opening a bot account if you are regularly making more than a few edits a minute." Thanks.  Lugnuts  (talk) 17:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Glorious 39 poster.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Glorious 39 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:32, 23 July 2010 (UTC)