User talk:Woomfy

You misunderstand
You misunderstand was needs to be said about the magazine--it does not matter whether it offensive, or that it only covers a certain genre. It does matter whether it is a significant publication within that genre--whether it carries important authors, whether it has wide circulation, and so on. If it's really struggling to even come out regularly, its importance will need some proving. The article will almost certainly be deleted now, but it can be re-started when you have the necessary information. DGG 23:58, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Forgotten Worlds Magazine
Sunday, June 17. I have incorporated the names of award-winning authors who have appeared in the publication, as well as circulation. The magazine does not struggle to come out, and is reliable as a quarterly publication.

Why was this deleted?
This magazine is professionally classified by review body Tangent. Tangent is A PROFESSIONAL science ficiton review board. This was made explicit in the article, as well as a link provided for proof. I have fulfilled the requirement mentioned previously by providing proof for the existence of this page. There is now no reason for it to be deleted.

I require an answer
This magazine is professionally classified by review body Tangent. Tangent is A PROFESSIONAL science ficiton review board. This was made explicit in the article, as well as a link provided for proof. I have fulfilled the requirement mentioned previously by providing proof for the existence of this page. There is now no reason for it to be deleted.

Please provide an explanantion as soon as possible.

Rafala page response
I shall attempt to update the page with more information shortly. Rafala has been reviewed positively in professioanal markets and I will provide the links to such markets shortly. He has appeared with authors such Lavie Tidhar and will provide links. He has also been published professionally in anthologies, which will be updated to the page shortly.

Update: References from reliable sources have been added and links provided to support keeping the page under current guidelines. Appearances with other well-established authors is noted and cited, adding weight to the position of this article's subject.

Additional update: Inline citations added, as required. The sources included are reliable, independent review bodies who review genre work, and therefore adheres to the guidelines which require such independent bodies, as notability is established by the recognition created by professional critics. Notability is also established by the author's continued appearance with other well-known authors, as noted on the page. Proof that reviews are independent can be seen by clicking through the listed websites to scan for various content and reviews of other bodies of work. Since footnotes/citations have been added, I have removed the yellow, inline citation bar, featuring question mark, since it did not state I could not. Since the sources are reliable, independent sources, I have removed the orange biography bar featuring exclamation mark, since it did not state I coud not.

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 12:58, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

The article you created was just deleted?
RE: User_talk:ThaddeusB Have you considered userfying the page?

Ikip (talk) 23:58, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Invitation
We both can appreciate how gut wrenching it is to see their hard work being deleted. I would like to invite you to join the WP:Article Rescue Squadron:

I hope all of these pretty templates help you! Best wishes and welcome to wikipedia! Ikip (talk) 00:02, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Immersion Press


A tag has been placed on Immersion Press requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 18:08, 9 October 2011 (UTC)