User talk:Woood

This is my talk page.

Re: Request for undeletion
Hi, Woood. I'm sorry that your image got deleted and that I didn't get your message before. It appears that you've just reuploaded it, so all appears to be well here - please contact me if this isn't the case. Yours, east. 718 at 08:46, April 13, 2008

Orphaned non-free media (Image:IAMs-vs-GCMs.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:IAMs-vs-GCMs.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Collapse (topology)
Hello. Please look at my edits to collapse (topology). Note that: Michael Hardy (talk) 15:20, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The title word, collapse should be set in bold at its first appearance; see Manual of Style;
 * Initial context-setting is needed to tell the lay reader that mathematics is what this is about. Strange though it may seem, even literate people often do not recognize the word "topology" as implying that it's about mathematics;
 * I got rid of the "inline" TeX. "Displayed" (as opposed to "inline") TeX works very well within Wikipedia.  "Inline" TeX often appears much bigger than the surrounding text or gets badly misaligned.

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Slow programming for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Slow programming is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Slow programming until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 17:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

February 2018
Hello, I'm Jauerback. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on David Clarke (sheriff), but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:30, 26 February 2018 (UTC)