User talk:Woqq445721624

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Graham 87 01:51, 12 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Heh! Not clear on the promotionality.--  Deep fried  okra    16:40, 12 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks the above administrator gave me the response and I can also have the template to contact you. Hello, this is user 'Woqq445721624', and I am confused about the blocking of which the reason is promotion/advertisement since I didn't promote or advertise anything in the sections I edited. First of all, I am sorry that the first edition I didn't put the references in my sections to support the validation. So, I followed your instructions and added the references in my second edition as well as some figures as the visual aids, I don't think there is any promotion or advertisement in them. If there is any other rule I didn't follow, please let me know, tell me more details and I will be happy to try my best to amend it to the best edition since I am working on this topic for several months and don't want to give it up. Thank you.--Woqq445721624 (talk) 16:59, 12 November 2019 (UTC)Woqq445721624
 * You've been promoting a relatively small subfield of research in articles that should be built on secondary sources like systematic reviews, not single studies. I will agree to unblock you (or for Deepfriedokra or anyone else who sees this to unblock you) if you undertake to not immediately edit any articles once unblocked, but instead to seek advice at the WikiProject Medicine talk page. Graham 87 02:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello, Graham87, I am sorry for replying to you so late, but I used this time to read the advice and also saw others' Wikipedia page and found my stuff is relevant to medical area but not as much as other pages do. I am not sure whether it is possible to generate my own page, which is classified into the engineering area, instead of editing other's pages? Thank you and look forward to your reply.
 * Nope, per the conflict of interest guideline. Graham 87 03:09, 27 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello, I have read through the link you suggested and didn't find there is any conflict... I didn't talk about myself, related person and there is no one paying me to do this. I read about 20 papers and summarized to get a general idea about how blood flows in a specific area, all the articles are summarized by myself except the figures, but the figures are also remade by myself. Did I summarize them still too narrow? Should I change the article more general? Or is there anything conflicting with the policy?
 * Oh, I thought you meant creating a page about yourself. Creating an article about a topic is possible but the main problem is finding pages that can link to it. For that, I would try to get some advice at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine first. If you promise to do this, I will unblock you. It seems like English is not your native language ... perhaps you would be better off editing in your native language's Wikipedia. Graham 87  14:29, 27 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Haha, no, what I mean is to generate my own page for this stuff instead of adding section in others' pages. Yes, I will follow the guideline you give me. No, English is not my native language, thank you for your advice but I need to generate it in English and I will try my best to make it understandable.
 * Alright, I've unblocked you. Happy editing! Don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes like this: "~" . Graham 87 16:39, 27 November 2019 (UTC)


 * OK, thanks for all the advice you gave. Woqq445721624 (talk) 23:41, 27 November 2019 (UTC)Woqq445721624