User talk:Wordhunter123

The paragraph in question that was deleted is biased. It has not been properly attributed or cited.
 * You can change the wording, but the fact that she was found and released is cited. Dr.   K.  18:58, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

The corrections, having now been attributed properly to a source, now meet all standards and guidelines. I am now able to read where this information directly came from, whereas before, I had no specific source to verify with. Much appreciate your improved and needed citation revisions. I have no further edits finding the revisions proper.

October 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Latifa bint Mohammed Al Maktoum have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:43, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Latifa bint Mohammed Al Maktoum was changed by Wordhunter123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957606 on 2021-10-18T03:43:21+00:00

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Latifa bint Mohammed Al Maktoum, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dr.  K.  04:28, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Latifa bint Mohammed Al Maktoum, you may be blocked from editing. Dr.  K.  15:45, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Latifa bint Mohammed Al Maktoum shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dr.  K.  15:45, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Latifa bint Mohammed Al Maktoum. Dr.  K.  23:42, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

No citation
This has not been properly cited Wordhunter123 (talk) 00:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Read WP:LEAD. If a fact is cited in the main article text it does not need to be cited at the lead, Regardless, to save you from being WP:BLOCKed, I added the full text at the lead with citations. Needless to say, you remove that at your own risk; the risk being a certain loss of editing privileges. Best of luck. Dr.   K.  00:49, 19 October 2021 (UTC)