User talk:Words & ideas

 Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Words & ideas/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Words & ideas/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 10:44, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

We have no interest in helping you with your job duties or in whether an article(not a "page") benefits the subject in some way. It's not up to me, but I very much doubt that you will be unblocked to edit about your clients at this time. If you want to be a more general contributor, please tell what you will edit about. Someone else will review your request. 331dot (talk) 16:43, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Please clarify why would an article about someone - be it my friend or client or someone totally unrelated to me - qualify as something that isn't allowed on Wiki? Is there some ground rule that is being broken here? So if I'm not allowed to do that, who actually creates these articles about people? It's a genuine wondering. Please clarify. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Words & ideas (talk • contribs)
 * Please don't use the unblock template for general discussion. I've converted the incorrect template into a comment.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:54, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Having to raise unblock request again because I can't quite find any other way to have a conversation with the admin-ing folks here. Every different user is intervening for different reasons, and my request for resolution is meeting no purpose. The person who is going to tend to this request, please direct me about what to do to get myself unblocked. Or if it is some comment/discussion method that I should be pursuing to reach a conclusion, kindly tell me how to go about that. Pasting my earlier query, because that was not attented to either: Please clarify why would an article about someone - be it my friend or client or someone totally unrelated to me - qualify as something that isn't allowed on Wiki? Is there some ground rule that is being broken here? So if I'm not allowed to do that, who actually creates these articles about people? It's a genuine wondering. Please clarify. Kindly unblock me because I'm more overwhelmed by the algorithm here, rather than with any intent to disrupt Wikipedia's cadence.
 * You have an existing unblock request that is open and visible to administrators, who do what they can when they can. Please be patient. Additional requests have no effect when you already have an open one. Articles are typically written by independent editors without any connection with the subject of their edits, who took note of the subject in independent reliable sources and choose on their own to write about it. Our only concern is summarizing independent reliable sources; we have no interest in how an article might help your clients. There may be benefits but that is secondary. As I said, it is doubtful that you will be unblocked to edit about your clients at this time. 331dot (talk) 02:26, 7 January 2022 (UTC)