User talk:WordsearcH56

Welcome!

Hello, WordsearcH56, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The secret Annexe, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ⇒ T A  P  16:35, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of The secret Annexe


A tag has been placed on The secret Annexe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ⇒ T A  P  16:35, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The secret Annexe


The article The secret Annexe has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No reason that this term is notable when applied to Anne Frank; no sources to support the claim that this is what 'The Secret Annexe' refers to.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 17:06, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dora Thewlis


A tag has been placed on Dora Thewlis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ob tund Talk 17:48, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dora Thewlis


The article Dora Thewlis has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Ob tund Talk 17:49, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Dora Thewlis
I think this is safe now from deletion. I've made a correction, added bits and three fairly good refs, and a stub tag. Could do with filling out and the refs being organised. Peridon (talk) 18:25, 20 June 2012 (UTC)


 * One other thing it needed was a lead sentence to say what she was and why she was notable. I've done a minimal one, and turned one of the non-inline, bare-url, refs into an inline formatted ref. But she obviously deserves a proper article, so I hope someone will now expand it enormously from the newspaper items and Liddle's book. Pam  D  23:18, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

The secret Annexe listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The secret Annexe. Since you had some involvement with the The secret Annexe redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). ⇒ T A  P  21:00, 20 June 2012 (UTC)