User talk:Wordsindustry

FINAL LEGAL NOTICE Refraining from Certain Activities

In accordance to the Wikimedia Foundation’s Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Code of Conduct I am hereby to demand the removal of the following content:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pegasus_Intellectual_Capital_Solutions http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Charles_G._Smith

Especially the following part:

Dear Mr. Smith: I know it's frustrating for you, but your company is ineligible for inclusion on Wikipedia. May I suggest that you stop wasting your time, and that you go advertise your company elsewhere. Please see also Wikipedia:Consequences of sock puppetry#Effect outside of Wikipedia for important information on the possible real-life consequences of sockpuppetry. Cheers, —Unforgettableid (talk) 18:25, 25 June 2013 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pegasus_Intellectual_Capital_Solutions

This demand is based on the following grounds:

1.	Terms of Use Section 4 4. Refraining from Certain Activities particularly Subsections Harassing and Abusing Others - Engaging in harassment, threats, stalking, spamming, or vandalism; and Engaging in False Statements, Impersonation, or Fraud - Intentionally or knowingly posting content that constitutes libel or defamation; http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#13._Disputes_and_Jurisdiction 2.	Code of Conduct Policy Section 1 Treat other people with respect - In general, people acting on the Foundation’s behalf should aim to be honest and ethical in their dealings with each other, with community members, project users, partners, suppliers and the public. http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Code_of_conduct_policy

According to the Wikimedia Foundation’s Code of Conduct Policy introductory notes This policy is maintained by the Wikimedia Foundation to apply to Foundation activities and All Wikimedia staff and members of the board of trustees are required to abide by this Code of Conduct. It is also intended to provide guidance for volunteers the presumption that Editors are acting on behalf of Wikimedia Foundation is therefore fully valid.

Additionally, this Code of Conduct is to apply to Editors because they act as volunteers on a voluntary basis for the Wikimedia Foundation. Therefore, they are fully obliged to comply with the above mentioned Section 1 – Threat other people with respect contained in the document Code of Conduct.

REQUEST:

For the above mentioned reasons I am hereby fully authorized to demand immediate, unconditional, complete, and permanent removal of the marked sections, content and links as being described hereby.

Please be advised that I will continue with these type of actions I am fully entitled to until my rightful demands are not completely fulfilled.

LEGAL NOTE:

This document, including its associated demands is entirely based and supported by the official regulations, rules, and recommendations of the Wikimedia Foundation as being mentioned hereby.

With an honest hope that this issue will be resolved in a peaceful manner and with no further delays or additional legal actions including court procedures I am expecting your answer and full compliance.

Please inform Ms. Rubina Kwon, and email it to her at rkwon@wikimedia.org about this issue.

Sincerely, ______________________ Charles G. Smith Managing Partner Pegasus Intellectual Capital Solutions LLC

Removal the offending and defamatory content.
According to personal recommendation from Ms. Rubina Kwon rkwon@wikimedia.org I'm hereby to request the removal of innapropriate content from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pegasus_Intellectual_Capital_Solutions

In expectation of your prompt compliance.

Regards.

July 2013
Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 14:49, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your posting of legal threats. The thread is Legal threats by User:Wordsindustry. Thank you. —Drm310 (talk) 15:29, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:58, 27 July 2013 (UTC)