User talk:Wordy15

October 2018
Hello, I'm LynxTufts. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Masonic conspiracy theories, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LynxTufts (talk) 19:08, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

source
Collective evolution (which you used as a source here) is known for being an unreliable source. Tornado chaser (talk) 23:36, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello "Tornado" - 1. Who has decided that "Collective evolution (which you used as a source here) is known for being an unreliable source`? --Wordy15 (talk) 21:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * A reliable source has a reputation for accuracy and fact checking. Collective evolution has a reputation for inaccuracy, they even talk about Q anon like he's real (which he's not ) Tornado chaser (talk) 00:15, 1 November 2018 (UTC)