User talk:Workadded~enwiki

Orphaned non-free image (Image:YugiGX53.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:YugiGX53.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:41, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Simpsons redirection
I've noticed you've decided to redirect some Simpsons episode articles to their respective seasons. While it's good that you've decided to be bold, I think it might be best if you stopped for now discussed the matter first. Take care. --Bongwarrior 20:42, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Pokemon Articles.
My friend, removing pictures from an article which are of no importance to the article, is not vandalism. You removing tags from articles with no reason is. If you wish to add Japanese Posters, they would go along with a "Japanese/English Differences" section, not the entire article. The "Pikachu the Movie" photos have absolutely NO importance to the articles. Furthermore, do not threaten me on my talk page by using the harshest warnings for 3 revert and Edit War templates. You are involved in the edit war, you have no business warning me. I suggest if you wish for the images to be used in the articles, you mention it on the talk page, until then, they will be removed. Spigot Map  04:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
I do hope you understand that we are both going to be banned from Wikipedia for edit warring as soon as an admin sees it. Spigot Map  11:54, 7 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I hope you're willing to discuss this matter after we get unblocked. Wikipedia has style guidelines, it's not a free-for-all, add whatever you want even if it does not belong. Spigot  Map  11:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

August 2007
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Pokémon Heroes. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. You need to be warned first, usually. Angus Lepper(T, C, D) 11:55, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not getting involved in the actual content dispute because I need to remain impartial if I'm going to monitor the article and report further edit warring. Please reach a consensus, as urged above, on the talk page. Angus Lepper(T, C, D) 12:04, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Spigot Map  22:46, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you add an inappropriate image to an article, you will be blocked from editing. Spigot Map  00:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

This is your only warning. The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Your edit summaries include attacking me. Spigot  Map  01:12, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
I have blocked you for 24 hours for violating the three revert rule and continuing to edit war at Pokémon: Lucario and the Mystery of Mew, despite being warned about edit warring previously. Will (aka Wimt ) 01:18, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Pokémon 3: The Movie
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism and similar articles will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You've been warned about 3RR. You've been warned about edit warning. You've been warned about the images. All these warnings have been consolidated into three words for you: please stop now. If you disagree with this '''then discuss it on the appropriate talk pages. Do NOT simply revert.''' Thank you. -WarthogDemon 22:04, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. You've already been blocked once for this. Spigot  Map  22:27, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Movies
You're quite amusing.

Like British humor, though. You know…not actually funny…—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 22:32, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Blocked for a week for persistent edit warring and possible vandalism. Academic Challenger 22:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Pokémon
The list of participants of the Pokémon WikiProject is quite sizable, however, there is no way to determine which of whom are active contributors to that project. All participants in the list have been moved to Inactive. If you consider yourself to be an active member of the Pokémon WikiProject, please go to WikiProject Pokémon and move your username to the Active section. Thank you. Useight (talk) 23:30, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Workadded. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Workadded~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 03:51, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:35, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)