User talk:Worlandooo

Matthew Ferraro
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Matthew Ferraro, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.matthewferraro.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:55, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Matthew Ferraro
A tag has been placed on Matthew Ferraro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ol Yeller '''Talktome 19:19, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Copyright violation
Hello,

The article you created was deleted as a copyright violation. This was done, despite your objection, for several reasons:


 * We have no proof that you in fact own the copyright on the text you have published.
 * If you are the owner, then publishing the text on Wikipedia is probably a conflict of interest. Editors are advised to refrain from editing articles about subjects with which they have a close personal connection.
 * Wikipedia requires content submitted to be released under a suitable free content license, such as the GFDL or a Creative Commons license (without a non-commercial restriction). Releasing content for "Wikipedia only" is not acceptable, and your release terms were not specific enough.
 * Even if the content is available under a free license, there were no citations in your article text. Wikipedia requires article content to be verifiable, by citing reliable sources.

Let me know if you have any further questions. --Chris (talk) 23:10, 19 July 2010 (UTC)