User talk:World Cinema Writer/Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakuel

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was not moved. Add the information to Alvin_and_the_Chipmunks_(film) if it's reliably sourced. -- Aervanath (talk) 05:53, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

User:World Cinema Writer/Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakuel → Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel — First of all, there two reasons why I wanted to move this page. The first reason is I've holded the rights to handle the article called Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel. So, I create the page in a SUBPAGE of the same name. And, suddenly some Wikipedian create a section called sequel on Alvin and the Chipmunks and redirect Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel there.

The second reason is the filming has alredy started and going to release on Christmas. So, we should already have an article about this film in Wikipedia.

World Cinema Writer (talk) 05:30, 18 April 2009 (UTC) — World Cinema Writer (talk) 05:30, 18 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Oppose - I don't think we should be starting Wikipedia pages on personal sub-pages. No individual 'holds the rights' to a Wikipedia article.  However, since you're the only contributor to your sub-page, there's no significant history to archive, and the material currently at Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakuel is a just a redirect, why don't you just copy and paste your existing content in this case?  In the future, I'd advise just beginning by creating and adding content to a proper Wikipedia page. ENeville (talk) 19:47, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Adding onto what ENeville is saying, please see WP:OWN. No one owns the rights to any article; this is a collaborative project can be worked on by anyone. That being said, feel free to copy and paste your article over the redirect, but be aware that it could be put up for deletion if other editors feel that it doesn't meet WP:N guidelines. ƒingers on  Roids  02:25, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, and ENeville, it is actually perfectly acceptable to draft Wikipedia pages on subpages, until they are polished up and ready to be put into the mainspace. ƒingers on  Roids  02:28, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.



Discussion

 * Any additional comments:


 * Looks like it's a simple move over a redirect, which you should be able to do without administrative intervention, but I'd recommend against moving your draft into article space for now, per WP:NFF. You'd need to give reliable source confirmation that principal photography has commenced, and even then the article might be deleted on the grounds that the movie's production is non-notable.  I would recommend that you wait to publish this article until closer to the release date; you can always add details to the redirect target.  Baileypalblue (talk) 11:09, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Christmas? Have they moved that up to the week after Easter this year? 199.125.109.124 (talk) 12:47, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.