User talk:Worldtvjr15

Welcome
 Hello Worldtvjr15, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents / Department directory


 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Worldtvjr15, good luck, and have fun. – Musdan77 (talk) 18:07, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Good Morning America
Please do not continue to add Sandy Hill to the former on-air staff section as she doesn't have a standalone article. Doing so is a violation of WP:LISTPEOPLE. Also, do not continue to revert as that is considered edit warring, or you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. IPadPerson (talk) 22:48, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
IPadPerson (talk) 22:55, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

TODAY article
It is REDUNDANT information. You are basically adding the same thing, except adding the years. It is NOT needed. Again, just because it is different in one article, does NOT mean it needs to be the same in the others. Good God! You are now being engaged in an edit war and may be blocked. I've started a discussion on the talk page of the article. You need to discuss it there before reverting again. If not, I or someone will report you to a noticeboard containing the admins. (Obviously this isn't your first edit war, either) You've been nothing but trouble since you've been here, and I see IPadPerson has already warned you once.  Corky  |  Chat?  01:44, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Today (U.S. TV program). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection.  Corky  |  Chat?  01:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to CBS This Morning. Amaury (talk) 01:49, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Morningtv13. Thank you.  Dwpaul  Talk   02:09, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Natalie Morales. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Jytdog (talk) 04:03, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 04:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)