User talk:Worldwar1989

May 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Oz\InterAct 17:57, 6 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, apologies for what has happened, I will admit I have been a bit trigger happy with the editing over the past few months but I promise if given a second chance it will not happen again, after more then a few warnings and also that now I have a better understanding of the rules. Okay thank you for your time and for your consideration and have a nice and lovely weekend. Worldwar1989 (talk) 05:34, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I was wondering if I'm still blocked from editing? Worldwar1989 (talk) 06:33, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

But come on, is an indefinite block really necessary? Worldwar1989 (talk) 06:42, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Someone else will review your request; the block will be removed when an administrator finds your request satisfactory. The blocked user does not get to choose the length of the block. Blocks are not a punishment, but a means to end disruption, and to be removed we must be convinced there will be no disruption. Merely reducing the block does not do that. If you have subsequent comments, please make them as standard, unformatted comments like this, as only one open block request is needed at a time. 331dot (talk) 09:24, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * If this editor is insisting too much, I think they can be provided a WP:ROPE but not without a topic ban from anything related to wars and military conflicts, because this subject saw most disruption from this user. They can still edit about Disney, Pepsi and even Buddha and Jesus but stay away from anything related to wars and military conflicts. >>> Extorc . talk  11:51, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Most disruptive editors insist too much without correcting their problems. Please indicate in your next unblock request if this proposed topic ban  from anything related to wars and military conflicts would be acceptable to you. I would also propose a zero revert rule that would prevent reverting any page without a consensus to do so. --  Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:19, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Canada–Iraq relations
Hello, Worldwar1989. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Canada–Iraq relations, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

If you know the do's and don'ts of what you can and should not do, you need to tell us what those are. Please also tell us if you are amenable to the topic ban idea described above. 331dot (talk) 07:30, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Well for one I know I would not undo current revision of an article just because I prefer the previous editions, only if the current page is inferior in quality through disruptive and excessive edit vandalism of the page Worldwar1989 (talk) 07:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

 * Rather than dive into a review, let me ask you this: Have you read WP:BRD? I'm not being flippant, it's actually a very important essay on how we edit here and sums it up nicely.  There are hundreds of thousands of editors here, all jockeying to have their edits stay in articles, which is why we have some basic rules on how to edit in a collegiate fashion.  Otherwise, the place would be chaos.  Going to the talk page and discussing an edit can be frustrating, particularly when the other party doesn't show up or the edit you are trying to make seems rather obvious, but you still have to do it to demonstrate a willingness to cooperate.  This means you have to play "the long game" when editing sometimes, being patient when there is a disagreement, and learning the dispute resolution system here.  It isn't perfect, but it is fair to everyone.  Have you read this, do you really think you can abide by this? And please explain in full.  is the blocking admin, so I will ping them. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 10:43, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Yeah I have browsed it quickly if that's your asking. Worldwar1989 (talk) 10:52, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
 * This is probably the essay you need to read in depth to understand our processes, to understand how to avoid the mess you currently find yourself in. I would suggest a closer and more detailed read because this is exactly what is expected of you, and what you've failed to do in the past, and it ties directly into your unblock request.  You would be expected to follow it.  Actually, everyone is.  Again, I fully understand how frustrating dispute resolution can be with someone who you thing is wrong about an edit, but it's still how we do things because we must to maintain the peace around here.  To be clear, I'm not trying to nitpick you, I'm trying to help you get unblocked, but that will only happen if you fully understand both the problem, and the solution. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 11:13, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I understand what saying and it's something I am willing to work on. Worldwar1989 (talk) 11:44, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Talk page access revoked
You've had 5 declines and started sockpuppeting, as demonstrated by a diffs and a CU. At this point, I can't help but feel you are requesting in bad faith. As such, I've removed talk page access. WP:UTRS would be your only option now, and I don't think that is going to happen until you have least spent 6 months without socking and without requesting an unblock. To any reviewing UTRS admin, I would suggest a CU check the history before considering an unblock. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 19:55, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Canada–Iraq relations


Hello, Worldwar1989. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Canada–Iraq relations".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:00, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Romny
Hello, Worldwar1989. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Romny, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Romny


Hello, Worldwar1989. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Romny".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:28, 9 December 2022 (UTC)