User talk:WotWeiller

Are you going to fill in the Service rifle and Service pistol sections you've added?
Greetings. It'd be great to have a Senegal, Oman, etc. section for those articles like you've added, but you've been adding new sections with no actual data. Are you intending to go back and fill those in? MatthewVanitas (talk) 02:02, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

If you're not going to put any actual data into the countries you've added, I'm going to go delete them. Don't add sections unless you have actual content. MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:47, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Trust me, i am going to fill them in. User:WotWeiller 18:16, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Madsen 50 With El Salvador
Do you have a source for the inclusion of El Salvador being a user of the Madsen 50. It would be very helpful in our updating the El Salvador Army page -- ie it got hit by some vandals. Thank you for any help.--Jackehammond (talk) 06:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

.

Proposed deletion of Cobra submachine gun


The article Cobra submachine gun has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrunkSquirrel (talk) 01:54, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cobra submachine gun


The article Cobra submachine gun has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced since 3 years.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrunkSquirrel (talk) 22:14, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of PH-45 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PH-45 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/PH-45 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ansh666 11:46, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of 400kV Forth Crossing for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 400kV Forth Crossing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/400kV Forth Crossing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Luke no 94 (tell Luke off here) 17:49, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Kumazo clan


A tag has been placed on Category:Kumazo clan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:03, 29 December 2019 (UTC)