User talk:WoudNathan

Vandalism
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Erasmus University Rotterdam: Revision history, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. The helpful 0ctopus (talk) 17:23, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Erasmus University Rotterdam, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that.   HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 18:11, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Recent edits to Erasmus University Rotterdam
Hey, I have seen your recent edits to this page. I believe that you are attempting to improve it, however this is not the way to go about it. First, you may be correcting outdated information, however some statements are uncited. Wikipedia is built on the concept of verifiability, that information should be cited to reliable sources. However, in this instance, you have replaced cited, verifiable statements with uncited, unverifiable statements. I recommend you do not reinsert those edits until you have found a good source for them.

Second, your massive removals of the rankings of the school. It is not necessary to keep all information up-to-date and correct; that itself does not justify deletion. Instead, they can simply be attributed to specific dates using phrases such as "As of " or "In ".

I recommend you reinsert your edits one at a time, as many of them have been found objectionable. Thank you for attempting to contribute! sam1370 (talk · contribs) 18:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)