User talk:Wozniakg

Fallen Sword
I have added a "" template to the article Fallen Sword, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SuperDT 01:19, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop removing tags
Please do not remove the notability and primary sources tags without addressing the problems they were placed on the page for. --OnoremDil 11:37, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Fallen Sword, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:Fallen Sword. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. 72.75.73.158 13:02, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Fallen Sword
Hey, Wozniakg, perhaps you could create the article out of namespace first, such as at User:Wozniakg/Fallen Sword, where you can take your time to gather references and no-one will delete it. When it is ready you can then create the article proper. Marasmusine 16:19, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Screen_1_large.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Screen_1_large.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:56, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

List of free MMORPGs
I'm afraid I don't quite follow what you're saying, but Wikipedia is not a repository of links - we shouldn't have pages of external links to sites which aren't notable enough for Wikipedia articles. --McGeddon 19:44, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid I don't quite follow what you're talking about... After you deleted my article I just stop writing anything on wikipedia because it doesn't have any sense. Deleting articles about new topic which doesn't have good references atm, but will have then in few weeks/months is stupid. So I don't care about what you put or not on List of free MMORPGs, because it won't be ever really good source of references for anyone. Most people are looking for new cool staff not for old good documented peace of shit. Wozniakg 15:57, 5 May 2007 (UTC)