User talk:Wperrenod

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Wperrenod, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Concordia College (New York) has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:30, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Copyright block
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you wish to resume editing, it may be necessary for you to demonstrate your understanding of these policies and reassure the community of your willingness to comply. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:16, 9 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Wperrenod, the notice that was left before you restored the text notes specifically "If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials." Simply putting content back without following instruction is not a good idea.


 * You should also be aware that as an employee of the school, you are required by our Terms of Use to publicly identify your affiliation with the school in making any edits to it. Please also read Conflict of Interest. Many subjects written about on Wikipedia misunderstand the purpose of our site, and that guideline will help clarify what you should and should not do. On the whole, your text does not appear non-neutral, but there are some problem areas like with the sentence "Concordia Conservatory is a preeminent center for music education in Westchester County", and the sourcing you have been employing in the article is for the most part primary which does not meet our verifiability policy. While primary sources can be used to add additional information on subjects, the bulk of our articles are meant to summarize neutrally what reliable, unrelated sources say about subjects. Local newspapers, for instance, can be a good source for Wikipedia content on schools, as can reliable handbooks written for future college students.


 * If requesting unblocking again, please indicate that you understand our copyright policies and will not add copied content from the school's websites without first verifying license as per one of the procedures set out at Donating copyrighted materials. Please also reassure us that you have read and will comply with WP:COI. This will be useful to the reviewing administrator. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your interest in following those directions. Unfortunately, you missed the second step, which requires that you put a notice on the talk page of the article of what you've done. Without that, I'm afraid it's difficult to tell that you are intending to comply.


 * At this point, we should wait for clearance of your permission through our volunteer email system of the permission before the text is restored to publication. I'll have a look to see if I can locate it in our email system, but if I can't we may need to wait until a volunteer accesses it.


 * In terms of your further edits to the page, do please read WP:COI and make sure that you follow the best practices recommended there. Unfortunately, Wikipedia is frequently targeted by entities that want to use our articles as promotion, and even though your article text seemed neutral to me, concern about this issue can result in intense scrutiny on articles, including labels. One of the more helpful things you could do is locate sources that are not published by or connected to the college to support the information, once it is cleared. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:24, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:39, 10 April 2015 (UTC)