User talk:Wqqkjans

June 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Semi-vegetarianism. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''Your edit is controversial and impresses as off-topic. Discuss it first on the talk page to gain consensus for adding it to the article.'' Zefr (talk) 19:12, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Semi-vegetarianism, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''"Carnetarianism" is a fabricated name with no presence in the scientific literature. Please don't refer to it or edit war over such a trivial term.'' Zefr (talk) 19:16, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Semi-vegetarianism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Zefr (talk) 19:33, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Please revert
In order to avoid a block on your account, you need to undo your last edit here immediately and instead seek consensus on the article talk page.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:40, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Never mind, it would appear your edits are simply vandalism/trolling:

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:43, 7 June 2019 (UTC)