User talk:Wrathofyazdan

Speedy deletion nomination of Bran Symondson


A tag has been placed on Bran Symondson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://artcollection.io/artist/5a7b1aac9c7e0400146c780d. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 11:26, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Bran Symondson

 * 1) I have found that the article Bran Symondson contains material copied from a number of different sources. I have checked the current version of the article, and it is not true that you "have fixed tha [sic] issue", if by that you mean that you have removed all copied text.
 * 2) Your comment "This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because i have given proper references" suggests that you may possibly be making the very common mistake of confusing copyright infringement with plagiarism. Roughly speaking, plagiarism is using someone else's work without attribution, whereas copyright infringement is using someone else's work without permission. It is no defense against a charge of copyright infringement to say that you openly announced where you were copying from without permission.
 * 3) Copyright is not avoided by making minor changes in wording, such as replacing "considered to be one of the most acclaimed reportage photographers" with "acknowledged to be among the most acclaimed reportage photographers" or "Bran came up with the concept" with "he came up with the concept". As a rough guide, if anyone looking at the two versions of a text can see that one is obviously derived from the other, then copyright is likely to be infringed.
 * 4) Don't remove speedy deletion tags from a page you have created yourself. This applies whether or not you are logged in to the account you used to create the page.
 * 5) Quite apart from any copyright issue, the article was quite unsuitable, as it was not written from a neutral point of view. It gave an unambiguous impression of being written by someone who has a high opinion of Symondson, and wishes to convey that opinion to readers. It should be impossible, when reading a Wikipedia article, to tell whether the writers of the article have a good opinion, a bad opinion, or no opinion at all of the subject they have written about.
 * 6) I see that you have created this article not long after starting editing Wikipedia. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start.  JBW (talk) 14:12, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

I had removed the copied content from the page, even before removing it was just 6% of entire article. I've seen article on Wikipedia with more than 80% copyrighted content. The supposed copyrighted are titles, names and nouns, there's no way I can change that. Wrathofyazdan (talk) 14:17, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) An editor posted a link to a copyright check comparing the article you created with just one existing web page, which showed a fairly small amount of overlap; it may well have been 6%. However, as I said above, the article contained text copied "from a number of different sources", and the total amount of copied material was considerable, as you must have known, since you created the article.
 * 2) The copied material was not just "titles, names and nouns"; it included numerous whole sentences, copied in some cases word for word, in other cases with trivial changes, as you must have known, since you created the article.
 * 3) As I said above with emphasis, I based my conclusions on the version of the article which was current after you had supposedly removed all copyright-infringing text, and you hadn't.
 * 4) I too have seen many Wikipedia articles containing not just 80% but 100% text copied from elsewhere. I spend a considerable amount of my time finding them and cleaning them up or deleting them. If you know of more of them, which have not yet been dealt with, please report them so they too can be cleaned up, or, if appropriate, deleted. JBW (talk) 10:23, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Bran Symondson moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Bran Symondson, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 18:29, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I can add more citations apart from his website which I was using as the main source. I had looked into google, his work is listed on multiple websites I can surely use them as reference. Wrathofyazdan (talk) 18:52, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Alexander Schliker moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Alexander Schliker, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gpkp  [ u • t • c ] 17:48, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Alexander Schliker


Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Alexander Schliker, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review --Blablubbs (talk) 09:50, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Martins I. Imudia


The article Martins I. Imudia has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not appear to meet WP:NBIO or otherwise demonstrate notability. No significant coverage in independent, reliable sources appears to exist."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. firefly ( t · c ) 09:59, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Martins I. Imudia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martins I. Imudia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Martins I. Imudia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. firefly ( t · c ) 10:42, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Martins I. Imudia. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 13:58, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

CbdMD, Inc. moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, CbdMD, Inc., is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:29, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. MER-C 14:46, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello, Wrathofyazdan. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Bran Symondson, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:40, 4 February 2022 (UTC) (Updated: repointing at draft Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:41, 4 February 2022 (UTC) )

Concern regarding Draft:Hedoine (brand)
Hello, Wrathofyazdan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hedoine (brand), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2 UNITS Podcast
Hello, Wrathofyazdan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2 UNITS Podcast, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Amara Communications
Hello, Wrathofyazdan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Amara Communications, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Idriss D
Hello, Wrathofyazdan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Idriss D, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 25 July 2022 (UTC)