User talk:Wrestlinglover/Archive 16

Check history before you revert things
All the PPV lists had links the the other lists. They all looked like this

WWE Page See also * List of TNA pay-per-view events * List of WCW pay-per-view events * List of ECW pay-per-view events

WCW Page See also * List of TNA pay-per-view events * List of WWE pay-per-view events * List of ECW pay-per-view events

ECW page See also * List of WCW pay-per-view events * List of WWE pay-per-view events * List of ECW pay-per-view events

And what do you do when you have multiple pages all linking to the same things? You make a template


 * What takes up more space: 3 lines of links in a subsection, or a template that has the exact same links in one line?74.47.97.119 (talk) 11:56, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

The "only common" thread is that everyone is the exact same thing. They are HIGHLY related, which is why every single one of them was interlinked in the first place. The footprint in a fifth the size with the template than it was before. The wikilink page promotes linking to any relevant articles.74.47.97.119 (talk) 12:21, 14 April 2010 (UTC)


 * See also section linking to related lists: 228 characters
 * Adding see all section linking to related lists to all six pages:1,368 characters


 * Template page: 501 characters
 * Adding the template to a page: 18 characters
 * Adding the template to all six pages: 108
 * Template page+Template in articles: 609


 * 609 < 1,368


 * It's less than half the space character wise.74.47.97.119 (talk) 12:35, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

RE:
Sure. Let's do Gail Kim first. Nikki ♥  311   18:30, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I usually write in subpages, too, for the same reason. Do you have one open or should we use one of mine? Nikki  ♥  311   02:31, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

I went ahead and copied the article to User:Wrestlinglover/Sandbox2. I suggest we work fast, as there is currently a backlog elimination drive going on at WP:GAN, so the sooner we list it the better. Nikki ♥  311   20:17, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Using a few references from WWE.com has never been a problem for any of my other GAs. Match results aren't usually controversial, so a primary source isn't an issue. If I did use another website to source the match results, it would be SLAM, but I've already relied on it pretty heavily in the article. I personally don't ever use PW Torch or WrestleView unless I'm desperate. I'd prefer to keep it as is unless the reviewer has a big problem with it. Nikki ♥  311   04:15, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm done with my part of Kim's article. How's your work going on your part? Nikki ♥  311   02:40, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

No rush. Just let me know when you are ready...or you can go ahead and nominate it when you are done. :) Nikki  ♥  311   03:18, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Wrestlemania III
As your knoweledge of wrestling seems to be quite extensive; amazing, actually, I thought that you might be able to be of help. I posted on the talk page for Wrestlemania III that there was a dark match that took place, and asked if anyone knew what it was. So far, no one has. I realize that, given your age, this was before your time, but given your passion for wrestling, I figured you might know the answer. If you do not, do you have any idea where I might look to check it out? I am 100% certain that there was one, and I really thought that it would have come back to me by now. All the best-Mk5384 (talk) 06:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I figured it was a longshot. Thanks for your response.Mk5384 (talk) 10:34, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Team Lay-Cool
I declined the speedy on Team Lay-Cool. Not a great article, but it clearly claimed that the team was important.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:32, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 April newsletter
Round two is over, and we are down to our final 32. For anyone interested in the final standings (though not arranged by group) this page has been compiled. Congratulations to, our clear overall round winner, and to and , who were solidly second and third respectively. There were a good number of high scorers this round- competition was certainly tough! Round three begins tomorrow, but anything promoted after the end of round two is eligible for points. 16 contestants (eight pool leaders and eight wildcards) will progress to round four in two months- things are really starting to get competitive. Anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Judge iMatthew has retired from Wikipedia, and we wish him the best. The competition has been ticking over well with minimal need for judge intervention, so thank you to everyone making that possible. A special thank you goes to participants and  for their help in preparing for round three. Good luck everyone! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 17:41, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter message
It has recently been brought to the attention of WP:PW that the newsletter is being to delivered to several users who have not been actively editing for several months. As a result, their talk pages have become increasingly large, unmanageable and slow to load due to a lack of archiving. In response, this message is being sent to all editors listed in Category:WikiProject Professional wrestling participants to say that anyone who does not list their name at WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Active before May 16 will be automatically listed at WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Nospam, and will no longer receive the newsletter or any notification of it. If you are added to WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Nospam, please feel free to remove your name if you desire. If you wish to continue receiving the newsletter as normal, please add your name to WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Active. If you simply wish to receive notification of a new issue, but not have the full newsletter delivered to your talk page, please add your name to the notification only list. If you have any queries please contact me at my talk page or leave a message at WT:PW. Thank you for your co-operation. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 00:36, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about your elimination
Will I heard you were eliminated from the WikiCup I'm sorry about that.--The guy dubbed Curtis23 Curtis23's talk 20:42, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

At least you made it to the second round.--The guy dubbed Curtis23 Curtis23's talk 01:43, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

How did you get into the WikiCup?--The guy dubbed Curtis23 Curtis23's talk Curtis23's Contributions 02:35, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

FIP World Heavyweight Championship
I was just browsing that article and noticed you reverted my additions, then added it back. It was announced on Twitter that Jon Moxley won the FIP World Heavyweight Championship. Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 22:19, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * There is no references for the some of the other stuff on that list. So what's with the double standards?  It was announced on Twitter.  You don't revert something like that just because one site doesn't have something doesn't mean it hasn't happened.   Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 17:53, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Are you single?
Hey ;-)

Just noticed you replied to one of my posts on the Miz's page (on his new tag team the jiz). I checke dout your profile and you seem pretty cool.

I know this is a weird place to do it but would you maybe like to go out some time? We live pretty close together, going off your profile. Maybe you can show me some wrestling moves.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.135.242.14 (talk) 16:07, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * .....lulz-- Unquestionable Truth -- 00:26, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Madison Rayne
I know you have some subpages going for some of the Knockouts, so I just wanted to let you know that I'm currently working on Madison Rayne. :) Nikki  ♥  311   20:44, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about Kim...I'm not in any hurry. Take your time. Good luck on your report. Nikki  ♥  311   21:07, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Staple Gun Matches
What do you have against Staple Gun Matches? -- Esemono (talk) 13:55, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Nothing, it was a link. The event has no article and thus shouldn't be linked to anything.-- Will C  19:45, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * But Staple gun match is an article .... -- Esemono (talk) 20:55, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, but the event doesn't realy have to do with the match. It is a title.-- Will C  21:05, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 May newsletter
We are half way through round 3, with a little under a month to go. The current overall leader is, who has 570 points. He leads pool C. Pools A, B and D are led by, and  respectively. Anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Two of last year's final 8, and, have dropped out of the competition, saying they would rather their place went to someone who will have more time on their hands than them next round. On a related note, a special thank you goes to for his help behind the scenes once again. There is currently a problem with the poster, perhaps caused by the new skin- take a look at this discussion and see if you can help. The competition has continued to tick over well with minimal need for judge intervention, so thank you to everyone making that possible. Good luck to all! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 20:55, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Victory Road (2010)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Victory Road (2010), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.surfingincognito.com/index.php?q=aHR0cDovL2VuLndpa2lwZWRpYS5vcmcvd2lraS9TbGFtbWl2ZXJzYXJ5X1ZJSUk%3D. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:14, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Slammiversary logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Slammiversary logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:27, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Hey
Hey Will, how you been? Listen, I'm sorry that I couldn't get the In wrestling section for that one dude, I've been busy with other stuff. If you haven't gotten to it, I wouldn't mind doing it. Listen, I would understand if you don't want to talk to me because of it, but I have a question, is this ---> "formerly the World Wrestling Federation (WWF)" unnecessary to add in a wrestler bio article, particularly the lead? -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  19:05, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Really? Wow, I had no idea, cause I haven't talked to you for a while. Well, if I was in your shoes, and asked a favor and it wasn't dealt with, I would be like 'Forget this person then.' Well, I'm glad you still would talk to me. ;) That's exactly my argument in Edge's article ["I don't see a problem with it if the wrestler was around when it was the WWF or got the most of his fame there."], well sort of. See, this one user removed that from the lead, but I ended up restoring it back, but another user ended up undoing my edit citing it was unnecessary to include, and I got warned for 3RR. I need a second opinion on this matter, cause this is really bugging me. I would bring this up at PW, but they're busy dealing with other stuff, so. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  20:10, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I remember having this discussion where you said you wouldn't log in everyday, only from time to time... I think. So, then this bit should be re-added to Edge's article, since he debuted with the WWF? Yeah, he became famous with the TLC matches during the WWF. With the WWE, he was already famous. IDK, this is getting on my nerves, am I making a such a big deal out of nothing? I mean, HBK and Christian's articles have this bit on their leads, never been challenged to be removed, I don't see why Edge is an exception, you know. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  20:26, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I guess you're right, accuracy is very important. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  20:38, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm good, thank God, just prepping myself for the summer, and glad school is over. :) What have you been up to? -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  22:27, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for my late reply, been out of it. That's cool, I hope everything is going good with your girlfriend. :) So, what's happenin' with TNA? Do you still watch it? -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  20:30, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I felt the same the week after Shawn gave his farewell speech; I was like 'What's the point? He's gone and the same storylines are due to happen, so what's the point of watching?', but I'll admit that I do watch it cause I want to see what goes on. IDK, it's not the same, you know. I watched an episode of TNA, but was completely lost as to what was going on; Bischoff was doing "business" with Flair and Hogan got pissed. Yeah, don't you hate it when they have the right story/feud there, but they just don't know what to do with it later on? Flair be the Godfather? That'd be funny. --  ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  17:29, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 June newsletter
We're half way through 2010, and the end of the WikiCup is in sight! Round 3 is over, and we're down to our final 16. Our pool winners were (A),  (B, and the round's overall leader),  (C)  and  (D, joint), but, with the scores reset, everything is to play for in our last pooled round. The pools will be up before midnight tonight, and have been selected randomly by J Milburn. This will be the toughest round yet, and so, as ever, anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Though unaffiliated with the WikiCup, July sees the third Great Wikipedia Dramaout- a project with not dissimilar goals to the WikiCup. Everyone is welcome to take part and do their bit to contribute to the encyclopedia itself.

If you're interested in the scores for the last round of the Cup, please take a look at WikiCup/History/2010/Round 3 and WikiCup/History/2010/Full/Round 3. Our thanks go to for compiling these. As was predicted, Group C ended up the "Group of Death", with 670 points required for second place, and, therefore, automatic promotion. This round will probably be even tougher- again, the top two from each of the two groups will make it through, while the twelve remaining participants will compete for four wildcard places- good luck everyone! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17

Orphaned non-free image File:Hard Justice 2009 logo.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Hard Justice 2009 logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:18, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Victory Road (2009) poster.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Victory Road (2009) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:35, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Re: Hey
What's up old friend? Yeah, it's been a while. Well, if you can help me out with Edge's article, in which people are adding he turned face cause he's teaming up with Cena and some other people to take on Nexus at SummerSlam, would be appreciated, cause that's yet to be determined and stuff. I'm the only dealing with this. Dude, it's fine, I mean I gotta apologize for not even starting work on Edge and Christian on one of the sandboxes. I haven't done any wrestling work. Dude, it's fine, we can probably find time and work on Gangrel. :) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  20:24, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, Fight Club that's a good film. :) Cool, cool, cause I would appreciate your help now. I don't understand why people can't read the hidden notes about not adding week-by-week and future matches. Yeah, hopefully, we get the time and complete it. Yeah, a collaboration with you (again) would be fun. Just don't tell your girlfriend. ;) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  20:48, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the only problems I have here are wrestling fans adding week-by-week, speculation on the wrestler's personality (face or heel), future matches, and some other BS. Those fools are the ones that give the "big headaches" and my real damn problem. Oh, she read it? Oops. No disrespect, I don't mean no harm. :P So, do you want to set a timeline, for you know, Gangrel/EC? -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  22:10, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's understandable, but I would appreciate your assistance in regards to him "turning" face. The rest I can deal with. Yeah, I get ya on the less problems thing. I've actually had to remove a couple of wrestling articles because either I didn't know if some info. was supposed to be in it or I just gave up due to the constant edit warring. She did? That's good, I made her laugh. One task down, make someone laugh, my job is done. :) Oh, I love that song, it's my favorite song from him. When I play the song, people start dancing to it or singing to it. Well, after I'm done with this one article, I can for sure start doing some work on E&C. Probably I'll start off with the lead. I guess after you're done with Nikki you and I can begin with Gangrel. Oh, a list? What kind of list? -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  22:34, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Cool, cool, and thank you, you have no idea how grateful I am. I still have it. ;) Oh, I always play the song when I'm listening to my Zen. It's such a great pump-up song. I'm listening to "Just Dropped In (To See What Condition My Condition Was In)". Excellent, then after I conclude my stuff, kinda need a break but at the same time seeking a GT out of it, I'll do my part on E&C. Oh a list, I thought you meant list list, but I get you know. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  22:55, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * IDK, if this is right. Oh well, I'll just deal with the "backlash" or whatever. I'm just sick of people adding "face" to the damn header, if they only knew they're not suppose to do that. Yeah, our GT mission is an impossible mission. Well, if you want to do your stuff first, I'll understand. If you want assistance, I'll be more than happy to assist. :) I know what you mean about new work and stuff; I've been there. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  23:40, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, so far no one has a problem with it, but let's just see how it plays out. Yeah, fictional wrestling terms, I too was the same, but now I've changed as you can see. Alright, after I get done with what I'm working on, I'll start on my part of this project. :) I hope I'm not like rushing you or whatever, cause that's not what I'm saying. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  18:20, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Hey Will
I've been good, keeping busy you know. I have not actually worked on any lists for a while, I got fed up with the whole process there for a while and I have not had a go at making a FL recently. I probably will again, but right now I'm just working on improving the Lucha articles, expanding stubs and adding new material. thanks for the offer, right now I'm just doing random stuff I stumble on but I'll let you know.  MPJ  -DK 06:36, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

RE: Gail Kim
It really isn't a big deal...so no worries. I'm in no hurry. I'd still work with you in the future, if you were to keep editing (and I hope that you do, because you are a quality contributor). Nikki ♥  311   19:53, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 July newsletter
We are half-way through our penultimate round, and nothing is yet certain. Pool A, currently led by has ended up the more competitive, with three contestants (,  and ) scoring over 500 points already. Pool B is led by, who has also scored well over 500. The top two from each pool, as well as the next four highest scorers regardless of pool, will make it through to our final eight. As ever, anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Planning has begun for the 2011 WikiCup, with open discussions concerning scoring and flags for next year's competition. Contributions to those discussions would be appreciated, especially concerning the flags, as next year's signups cannot begin until the flag issue has been resolved. Signups will hopefully open at some point in this round, with discussion about possible changing in the scoring/process opening some time afterwards.

Earlier this round, we said goodbye to, who has bowed out to spend more time on the book he is authoring with his wife. We wish him all the best. In other news, the start of this round also saw some WikiCup awards sent out by. We appreciate his enthusiasm, and contestants are of course welcome to award each other prizes as they see fit, but rest assured that we will be sending out "official" awards at the end of the competition. If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 22:53, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

BFG '10
Hey,

Tickets permitting (I doubt they'll sell out first day) I'll be heading to Bound For Glory in Daytona this October. I'll be bringing a camera with me and try to snap lots of pictures. Can't be sure what seats I'll get, but hopefully I'll come back with some decent stuff that you can incorporate into some TNA articles. Hazardous Matt (talk) 19:17, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll see what I can do. I'm not sure I'll be able to get backstage or anything, but I'll snap shots of what crew members I can.  I'll try to get a good shot of the set, too.  I might aim for seats that are in line with the entrance. Hazardous Matt (talk) 13:09, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Just got the tickets. Looks like I'll be a few rows back Camera-Right.  I should be able to get some good in-ring shots during the event, and I'll get whatever I can of the set and crew.  October can't come soon enough.  I haven't been to a live show that wasn't the Impact Zone in 15 years.  Hazardous Matt (talk) 14:23, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

I'm trying to make a list of some of the shots you wanted. When you said crew, did you just mean referees, or things like sound and camera guys? So far I'm going to try for an exterior of the Arena, a good shot of the set, a wide-shot of the interior of the arena, and random shots of the athletes. Hazardous Matt (talk) 20:09, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Re:
Yes, I have. I was going to reply to the last message you sent me, but I saw your note so I figure what's the point of replying if you have limited internet access. Alright, cool, and I'll do my part with E&C. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  17:16, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
You have  new messages ( last change ).  — fetch ·  comms   19:08, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

RD Reynolds AfD(I think)
Hello. I have (apparently) nominated an article for deletion at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/R._D._Reynolds

You views/thoughts etc. are gratefully required. Spoke shook (talk) 11:50, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 August newsletter
We have our final eight! The best of luck to those who remain. A bumper newsletter this week as we start our home straight.


 * Pool A's winner was . Awarded the top score overall this round, Sturmvogel_66 writes primarily on military history, favouring Naval warfare.
 * Pool B's winner was . Awarded the top score for featured articles this round, Casliber writes primarily on natural sciences, especially botany and ornithology.
 * Pool A's close second was . Awarded the top score for featured pictures this round, Sasata writes primarily on natural sciences, favouring mycology.
 * Pool B's close second was . Awarded the top score for good articles and topics this round, ThinkBlue primarily writes content related to television and film, including 30 Rock.
 * The first wildcard was . Awarded the top score for did you knows and valued pictures this round, TonyTheTiger writes on a number of topics, including baseball, American football and Chicago.
 * The second wildcard was . Someone who has helped the Cup behind the scenes all year, White Shadows said "I'm still in shock that I made it this far" and writes primarily on Naval warfare, especially U-boats.
 * The third wildcard was . Awarded the top score for featured lists and topics this round, Staxringold primarily writes on sport and television, including baseball and 30 Rock.
 * The fourth wildcard was . Entering the final eight only on the final day of the round, William S. Saturn writes on a number of topics, mostly related to Texas.

We say goodbye to the six who fell at the final hurdle. only just missed out on a place in the final eight. was not far behind. was awarded top points for in the news this round. contributed a variety of did you know articles. said "I'm surprised to have survived so far into the competition", but was extactic to see Finland in the semi-finals. did not score this round, but has scored highly in previous rounds. We also say goodbye to, who withdrew earlier this month after spending six weeks overseas. Anyone interested in this round's results can see them here and here. Thank you to for these.

Signups for next year's competition are now open. Planning is ongoing, with a key discussion about judges for next year open. Discussion about how next year's scoring will work is ongoing, and thoughts are more than welcome at Wikipedia talk:WikiCup/Scoring. Also, TonyTheTiger is compiling some information and statistics on the finalists here- the final eight are encouraged to add themselves to the list.

Our final eight will play it out for two months, after which we will know 2010's WikiCup winner, and a variety of prizes will be awarded. As ever, anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 23:18, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Re: Finally
Awesome! Thanks for the note. :) Nikki  ♥  311   01:13, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

The Gerweck should be fine since it is an interview. The forum one was definitely questionable (b/c it would be hard to prove it is really her), so I tried to replace it with a WWE source that named the move. Plus, it wasn't formatted or anything, so that must have been one I overlooked. For some reason, though, it isn't formatting correctly. Do you know what the problem is? Nikki ♥  311   02:26, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

It is a company that distributes music and collects licensing fees. It should be fine. Nikki ♥  311   04:01, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Not that I know of...those stupid awards are the hardest to source! If PWI has an annual issue that they reveal the winners in, you could just cite the issue from that year. Nikki ♥  311   02:56, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: Gangrel
Oh, alright. Congrats on finally finishing Gail Kim, I know you've been working very hard on this and about time that you've accomplished it, so. :) If you need help with Gangrel I'll try to do my best. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  22:47, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah I forgot you and Nikki were working on Gail Kim, I can't believe I forgot. I guess I'm a have to start on E&C, and multi-task, which I always do. IDK, cause Nici is preparing to go back to school and told me that once she starts she's not sure she'll have much time to be here. I'll begin work on E&C shortly. Damn, I haven't touched a wrestling article in quite some time; I haven't worked on a wrestling article is what I mean. Maybe those topics will be at GAC... soon. ;) If she needs help with her topics I'll be willing to help, and if you need anything let me know. :) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  15:26, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * No, no, I gots to finish it now, don't want to leave you hanging when you finish Gangrel. I just need to work in two or three sections and I'm done, well, then I have to work on the lead. Well, I wish you good luck on your future non-wrestling projects. :) Oh, that sucks [Nici refusing to talk to you]. If you guys need help or whatever let me know and I'll see what I can do. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  21:31, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Are you saying that cause you don't see yourself finish Gangrel soon? My only reason of finishing E&C is to get points at the WikiCup as I'm one of the finalists, and I REALLY need points. Yup, that's my name just don't take it. ;) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  21:43, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you asked me and I told you, so. If I work hard enough E&C will be done... soon. Well, I don't see myself leading, but I'm a have to work hard to get those points. Well, you say that Gangrel and E&C are the only articles left for the E&C topic so might as well get that over with... now... catch my drift? WikiCup. --  ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  22:12, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, duh [about your thing, no not that thing the other thing]. ;) I'll probably have E&C done tomorrow, though I'm not sure about the lead, but the prose. We have to get the Brood as well for the E&C topic? Really? I've been here almost four years with 44,000 edits, and I have no idea what I am. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  22:51, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

I did get it, though, I didn't think I needed to respond, sorry if I had to. Have you tried looking in Canadian Online Explorer or even Online World of Wrestling? That's basically the places to look. I can try and see if I can find anything in NewsBank and let you know what I find. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  05:39, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:SamoaJoe0407.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:SamoaJoe0407.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:44, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Misclick?
? Courcelles 20:39, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 September newsletter
We are half-way through our final round, entering the home straight. leads at the time of writing with 1180 points, immediately followed by with 1175 points. closely follows in third place with 1100 points. For those who are interested, data about the finalists has been compiled at WikiCup/History/2010/finalists, while a list of content submitted by all WikiCup contestants prior to this round has been compiled at WikiCup/History/2010/Submissions. As ever, anything contestants worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Despite controversy, the WikiCup remains open. Signups for next year's competition are more than welcome, and suggestions for how next year's competition will work are appreciated at Wikipedia talk:WikiCup/Scoring. More general comments and discussions should be directed at the WikiCup talk page. One month remains in the 2010 WikiCup, after which we will know our champion. Good luck everyone! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 23:11, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

BFG Pics
Hey again,

Just got back from Daytona about twenty minutes ago. I got some decent pictures. I'll be throwing them up on a MobileMe gallery later. I'll send you think link via e-mail. It's got my real name attached. I'd like to keep all of that off-wiki. Anyway, you can either take what you want or let me know which ones you want me to upload. (The show was awesome by the way.) Hazardous Matt (talk) 18:55, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Let me know if you didn't get the e-mail. It might have ended up in a spam folder or something since it was automated. Hazardous Matt (talk) 04:58, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Added my e-mail address. It should be there.  (I guess it doesn't let you e-mail yourself.)  Hazardous Matt (talk) 15:30, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I've always thought so. Anyway, the photos are pretty hi-res when you download them.  There's one of Tommy Dreamer being smashed into a cage and at full size you can see his face being mushed into the grating.  Might be good for a Lethal Lockdown article.  Hazardous Matt (talk) 13:36, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Take your time, dude. I would have done it myself, but every time I think about contributing I visit WT:PW and that urge quickly subsides. I tried to get the best pictures I could. I learned next time I should set it up to take multiple shots in a row. I think the set with the cage came out well (which should work for the event page). I wish I had a better picture of EV2 together, not just their backs. Hazardous Matt (talk) 21:12, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2010
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 19:02, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 October newsletter
The 2010 WikiCup is over! It has been a long journey, but what has been achieved is impressive: combined, participants have produced over seventy featured articles, over five hundred good articles, over fifty featured lists, over one thousand one hundred "did you know" entries, in addition to various other pieces of recognised content. A full list (which has yet to be updated to reflect the scores in the final round) can be found here. Perhaps more importantly, we have our winner! The 2010 WikiCup champion is, with an unbelievable 4220 points in the final round. Second place goes to, with 2260, and third to , with 560. Congratulations to our other four finalists –, , and. Also, congratulations to, who withdrew from the competition with an impressive 2685 points earlier in this round.

Prizes will also be going to those who claimed the most points for different types of content in a single round. It was decided that the prizes would be awarded for those with the highest in a round, rather than overall, so that the finalists did not have an unfair advantage. Winning the featured article prize is, for five featured articles in round 4. Winning the good article prize is, for eighty-one good articles in round 5. Winning the featured list prize is, for six featured lists in round 1. Winning the picture and sound award is, for four featured pictures in round 3. Winning the topic award is, for forty-seven articles in various good topics in round 5. Winning the "did you know" award is, for over one hundred did you knows is round 5. Finally, winning the in the news award is, for nineteen articles in the news in round three.

The WikiCup has faced criticism in the last month – hopefully, we will take something positive from it and create a better contest for next year. Like Wikipedia itself, the Cup is a work in progress, and ideas for how it should work are more than welcome on the WikiCup talk page and on the scoring talk page. Also, people are more than welcome to sign up for next year's competition on the signup page. Well done and thank you to everyone involved – the Cup has been a pleasure to run, and we, as judges, have been proud to be a part of it. We hope that next year, however the Cup is working, and whoever is running it, it will be back, stronger and more popular than ever. Until then, goodbye and happy editing! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 03:14, 1 November 2010 (UTC)