User talk:Wrestlover

April 2013
Hello, I'm STATicVerseatide. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to WrestleMania XXVIII seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  STATic  message me!  03:49, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Really, I'd love for you to explain how my was in any way POV. The tagline for WrestleMania 28 was "Once in a Lifetime", which was confirmed as a fallacy when the WrestleMania 29 main event was booked in January. Since we're throwing around doctrines, here's one for you: WP:OWN. Wrestlover (talk) 12:38, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Static isn't violating WP:OWN just by disagreeing with your edit. I would have to agree with him: "fallacy" is a very opinionated word when used in this context. We should allow the reader to make their own mind up. We've stated that there was a rematch, but by saying that the tagline was a fallacy is your conjecture. Also, regarding the comments of mine you removed: you may be uninterested in what I had to say, but being overtly belligerent will only hinder your ability to be a part of this community. —  Richard  BB  12:41, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh well, I guess I don't have enough standing in the boys club yet to make an edit to that particular article. Seems I've ventured across the line where Wikipedia becomes Agendapedia. IN MY OPINION ;) Good day. Wrestlover (talk) 12:48, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I'd once more point you towards WP:AGF. In fact, forget that — perhaps WP:SCREW is more accurate. There is no agenda-driven conspiracy to eliminate the edits of newer users. You'll notice that your more neutral edits have been accepted just fine... —  Richard  BB  12:55, 29 April 2013 (UTC)