User talk:Wroeththo

File permission problem with File:PeaceJam's Nobel Peace Summit.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PeaceJam's Nobel Peace Summit.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January ( talk ) 17:11, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:PeaceJams 10th anniversary.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PeaceJams 10th anniversary.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January ( talk ) 17:12, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Dawn Gifford Engle at the 2014 Monte Carlo Film Festival.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dawn Gifford Engle at the 2014 Monte Carlo Film Festival.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. January ( talk ) 17:15, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Cedric chambers
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cedric chambers, and it appears to include material copied directly from https://cedricchambers.com/about/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:19, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cedric chambers


A tag has been placed on Cedric chambers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:51, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Copyright and notability
Wikipedia cannot host copyrighted material without a formal copyright release, see Copy-paste; but even if the copyright issue were resolved, simply copying the subject's own website is not the way to make an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia is not a free advertising noticeboard for promotional material; see User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard for background.

Wikipedia has an inclusion criterion called Notability, which is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything without editorial control; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones like galleries or publishers, and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought him important or significant enough to write substantial comment about? See also Notability (summary) and WP:CREATIVE.

There is good general advice at Your first article. If you are connected with Cedric Chambers, you should also read the guideline Conflict of interest. JohnCD (talk) 22:27, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Adolfo perez esquivel rivers of hope
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Adolfo perez esquivel rivers of hope, and it appears to include material copied directly from https://filmfreeway.com/project/adolfoperezesquivelriversofhope.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:05, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

STOP misrepresenting sources
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Joseph Rotblat. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sundayclose (talk) 21:05, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at One Billion Acts of Peace. Sundayclose (talk) 17:16, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
Sundayclose (talk) 17:30, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Please read
Looks like you've run into some issues editing here. Please read the above messages carefully and respect Wikipedia's copyright and sourcing policies. --Neil N  talk to me 23:23, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Ways to improve Hypnautic
Hi, I'm Gab4gab. Wroeththo, thanks for creating Hypnautic!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The sources and content are more appropriate for an article on Top Flite Empire than Hypnautic. There is only trivial coverage of Hypnautic separate from the group. My searches found nothing helpful.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Gab4gab (talk) 18:06, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Hypnautic for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hypnautic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hypnautic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gab4gab (talk) 21:13, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello Wroeththo. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Wroeththo. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. YODADICAE👽 17:25, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello

I do not make updates often and I did not see the updated terms of service. I do not work for or volunteer for the PeaceJam Foundation in an official capacity, (I'm not going to events or volunteering at booths, nor do I receive volunteer hours, or any other kind of compensation), I have in the past but I am currently fully employed elsewhere. Similar to the many volunteers at the Wikimedia Foundation. I volunteer my time without any form of compensation direct or otherwise for the group of pages associated with the PeaceJam Organization. The group is notable for its involvement with Nobel Peace Prize winners, the pages themselves have existed well before I updated them.

I was unaware of any need for official disclosures on Wikipedia until today, and in the future, as required in the terms of use I will leave "a statement in the edit summary" and or disclose them on my user page. Thank you for informing me of these requirements.

Wroeththo (talk) 01:07, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cedric Alessandro Chambers


A tag has been placed on Cedric Alessandro Chambers, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cedric Chambers. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. YODADICAE👽 17:27, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: One Billion Acts of Peace (May 29)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:One_Billion_Acts_of_Peace Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Berchanhimez was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Regardless of the notability of the parent organization, this one venture by them is virtually certainly not notable enough for its own article. You may wish to work on Draft:PeaceJam for the parent organization which can contain information about this venture if it is accepted

-bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez (User/say hi!) 03:49, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: PeaceJam (July 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sionk was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PeaceJam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:PeaceJam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:PeaceJam Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sionk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:PeaceJam reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sionk (talk) 21:07, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:One Billion Acts of Peace
Hello, Wroeththo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:One Billion Acts of Peace, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:One Billion Acts of Peace


Hello, Wroeththo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "One Billion Acts of Peace".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:37, 1 December 2021 (UTC)