User talk:Wrongy77

February 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page CPN Cudis has been reverted. Your edit here to CPN Cudis was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/cpncudis/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:51, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to CPN Cudis. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 12:45, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Wrongy77/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Wrongy77/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Melcous (talk) 12:46, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Comments
I've decided to hold off speedy deleting again for now, and just made these edits. Please read the following carefully.


 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines for companies. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * you must write in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Don't make claims for the products that aren't supported by independent third-party sources
 * it's all about what the company sells, which itself looks spammy. There is little about the company itself other its location. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, turnover or profits.
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. That's particularly the case when they are spamlinks to affiliated sites.
 * the article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source.
 * You must write in your own words. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, and copied text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
 * If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. In particular, if you work directly or indirectly for the organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:    . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  07:27, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for disclosing your COI, which I have moved to the article talk page and reformatted. If you work for or on behalf of the company, you still need to add the formal declaration to your user page, using   Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Ambox warning pn.svg I notice that you are continuing to edit the draft despite not having made the formal declaration above. Please take this as a final warning; you will be blocked otherwise. If you have any queries ask me, don't just ignore the message. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  13:37, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Having declared your paid status does not mean that you can ignore the advice above. You still have no references, lots of external links in text and unsourced promotional claims.


 * The newly revised Notability (organizations and companies) has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met, none of which was met by your list at the end
 * significant coverage in
 * independent,
 * multiple,
 * reliable,
 * secondary sources.
 * Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.


 * Pinging User:Zawl as decliner Jimfbleak - talk to me?  10:53, 3 April 2018 (UTC)