User talk:Wronkiew/Archives/2008/November

Great job with GA reviewing
When I saw this, I was very impressed at your GA reviewing skills. Great work.  miranda  04:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your encouragement. I have been doing peer reviews recently, but maybe I will get back into GA reviews. Wronkiew (talk) 05:53, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

PR of ISS
Just a quick message to say thanks very much indeed for you Peer Review of the International Space Station article - it's much appreciated, and I'll get to work on sorting out the points you raised. Many thanks! Colds7ream (talk) 13:10, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I've posted an initial response to your review after implementing some of the changes suggested - I'd appreciate some feedback on what I've done so far! :-) Thanks again, Colds7ream (talk) 17:00, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Your attempt to represent me on User talk:Afed
I understand that you are trying to represent me on User talk:Afed, but that is quite alright, thank you. --Jacj (talk) 06:01, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Very well! No more representation from me will you get. Wronkiew (talk) 06:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for removing this vandalism from my page. Keep up the good work! America69 (talk) 19:58, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback
Thanks for your input at my successful Rfa. I'm already thinking about working on my content creation. Hopefully in a few months, I'll have passed the point where you would've !voted Support. If you have any more suggestions on how I can improve myself as an editor, I'd be happy to hear them. Happy editing!--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 21:29, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Congratulations on passing your RfA, and best of luck with your new role! Wronkiew (talk) 10:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia AP Biology Project
I noticed your offer to help. If there is a topic of personal interest please drop me a line and I'll list you as the mentor for that student.

The students without mentors and there topics are listed here: WikiProject AP Biology 2008 If you have no personal preferences based on a subject - then I can think of a couple of students who could use guidance. Either way - thanks for the offer. --JimmyButler (talk) 17:31, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I know someone with an interest in birth, so HannahSharpe would be a good choice. Otherwise any student who is interested in getting feedback and improving their article would be fine. Wronkiew (talk) 18:35, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. I've listed you as Hannah's mentor on the project page. Feel free to provide guidance as you see fit. Ideally, suggestions, regarding prose and content; perhaps even a "list" of concerns for her to address. On formatting issues and html. its often easier just to make the adjustments or provide specific examples. I'm sure she will appreciate any help that you may provide! --JimmyButler (talk) 02:01, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Gerard K. O'Neil
Hi, Wronkiew. :-) I accidentally archived your comment without a reply, so please excuse the late reply. The article overall is not bad, although you may want to make sure that the use of typewriter quotes (" ") versus curly (“ ”) is consitent. Cheers! &mdash; Mizu onna sango15 Hello!  21:56, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reviewing the article. Are you referring to the typewriter quotes in the source citations, or are is there an inconsistency somewhere else in the article that I missed? Wronkiew (talk) 07:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

more
Hi, Wronkiew. I am uncertain whether or not you saw my my further comments  in response to your question about alternative structure. Shall I consider our discussion closed? Anne Teedham (talk) 15:41, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I did see your additional comments, thank you. I am still working out how to best incorporate your suggestions. One that I have done was to remove the summary of the Space colonization section. This eliminates one of the three mentions of his freshman physics class. I don't think a passage about O'Neill with an imaginary machine would be encyclopedic, although I do understand your point about emphasizing the mass driver. I didn't find Rudolf Wanderone very compelling. That's probably just because I'm about as interested in pool as you are in space colonization. You can close the peer review; I doubt anyone else will offer comments on it. Thanks again for your review. Wronkiew (talk) 18:07, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

ISS PR
Hi Wronkiew - just a quick request; as you can see, there's been a lot of work going on at the ISS article following your PR, and it'd be grand if you could have another look and see what remains to be done before we go to GAN. Many thanks in advance, Colds7ream (talk) 17:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll take another look at the article and let you know if I find any additional problems. For now, check the article against the GAN quick-fail criteria, and, if there are no major issues, go ahead and nominate it. There is a month and a half long backlog at GAN, so it could take a while to get a reviewer, and you have plenty of time to make improvements before it is reviewed. Even if it gets reviewed right away, you will still have a week to address any problems the reviewer finds. Wronkiew (talk) 17:35, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I've put up a suggestion with regards to GAN on the PR page - have a look and see what you think! :-) Many thanks again! Colds7ream (talk) 19:08, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
The Barnstar | My RFA  | Design by L'Aquatique