User talk:Wronkiew/Archives/2009/May

Your GA nomination of Diffusion damping
The article Diffusion damping you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Diffusion damping for things needed to be addressed. Wronkiew (talk) 05:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review. I believe I have now addressed all of your objections. -- Rmrfstar (talk) 03:27, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I noted a few remaining issues on the GA review page. Wronkiew (talk) 04:26, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * And I have addressed them. Thanks. -- Rmrfstar (talk) 11:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for the pleasant, helpful review. -- Rmrfstar (talk) 16:16, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps invitation
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:53, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 14:11, 19 May 2009 (UTC)