User talk:Wspanier

January 2018
Hello, I'm BytEfLUSh. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Stephen C. Meyer— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. BytEfLUSh Talk 02:03, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:39, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 02:40, 20 January 2018 (UTC) {{unblock|1= Three reasons : First, for an edit-war to exist 2 parts are needed.So the other part was involved in an edit-war as well Second, I think that an Encyclopedia must not take the part of any ideology by characterising persons , giving them names and properties. The people who believe that a given person deserves these characterisations must be nominated so the readers can form their opinion freely and not be misleaded by adjectives like "pseudoscientist" Third, I am frequent reader of Wikipedia for at least 15 years and I haven't noticed this rule of 3 edits in one day - even now I don't know where it is}