User talk:Wstrain

September 2018
Hello, I'm Apap04. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, C. Scott Grow, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. apap04talkundefinedcontributions 01:18, 12 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Hello Apap04. My designation as historian of the C. Scott Grow campaign is legitimate. I purposefully left my real name for this purpose. I am verifiable. Senator Grow himself asked me to make this change to HIS wikipedia as well as one other I plan to make today. The reason he wants it there is to clarify that he was released from his position in the LDS church last year. He has the right to clarify his own bio. He has a signed certificate on his wall stating such, but it has not been announced to the public. (This has created some confusion for constituents). That announcement is scheduled in two weeks. At that time, I can site the worldwide announcement, but at this time, we ask that you please return the change as well as leave the additional change I am adding today. This information is time sensitive and pertinent. Thank you. Wstrain (talk) 18:25, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Your edits to C. Scott Grow
A few things you should note carefully: If you have any questions about any of this, feel free to ask them here but please do not edit the article again without reading and responding to these linked policies. Not doing so can lead to you being banned from editing here. Thank you Melcous (talk) 08:41, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * You have a clear conflict of interest with regards to this article and as such are asked not to edit the article directly. You may instead use the Template:Request edit to propose changes on the talk page.
 * If you are working for the subject's campaign, then you meet the definition of a paid editor and you must abide by the relevant policies which includes a formal, standardised notice on your user page - this is not optional, it is a term of use which you agreed to when creating an account here.
 * Content in articles needs to be sourced to reliable, independent, secondary sources - firsthand knowledge such as you are claiming is not sufficient
 * Wikipedia is never time sensitive as this is an encyclopaedia and not the news
 * Wikipedia article are not owned by anyone, including the subject of the article. I.e. it is not "his" article