User talk:Wsxcftyhnmko/sandbox

This is a really strong beginning for an article. The information is correct and cited accurately, but there is little explanation of scientific terms that readers may not understand. I would suggest briefly explaining/defining those terms such as lanceolate bract and Moraceae, even though you have included internal links to Wikipedia pages. Additionally, there are grammatical errors throughout. In the Conservation section in particular, the beginning of sentences don't have capitalization, and there is not always correct grammar. The lead section is to the point and strong, but I would add a bit more information to better cover all you plan on talking about in your Wikipedia page. Sarbaer324 (talk) 19:19, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

comment
I am learning of a plant I never knew existed, thank you! However, I am not sure on some of the terms you are using. You might want to go in and tone it down. There are a few grammatical errors as well as a missing period in the first paragraph. I think you could expand the first paragraph and tell us more about the tree and why it is endangered. What is causing the habitual loss, for example. The last thing I would recommend is to flip your "External Links" and your "References" sections. This way your external links are 4 and your references are 5. Other than these suggestions, I think it is done well. Kepp up the good work! Russece (talk) 22:30, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

what have i done
I have added conservation, distribution, and a description section. added multiple sources for references. the language used to describe the tree has been made easier to read. Wsxcftyhnmko (talk) 18:44, 26 October 2018 (UTC)