User talk:Wtf steve

Fair use rationale for Image:Punk jello biafra3.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Punk jello biafra3.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 01:26, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on BuddhaInside requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD 20:38, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Okay
I suppose that "not a useful contributor" was an overly harsh assessment; however, going to the trouble to find out what was the first account blocked for vandalism, and then creating an article about it, does not make it look like you have the project's best interests at heart. Rather, it gave the impression that you were glorifying vandalism.

I have carefully examined your other edits, and you were in fact a useful contributor. I apologize for my misjudgment; you are unblocked and are once again welcome to participate. DS (talk) 15:47, 12 December 2007 (UTC)