User talk:Wtimrock

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. - EurekaLott 01:45, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ybeth Bruzual
A tag has been placed on Ybeth Bruzual, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. NAHID 22:57, 28 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Please do not remove the speedy tag from the article. It is considered a form of vandalism.  If you disagree with the article being nominated for a speedy deletion add   on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 16:55, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Waynerogers.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Waynerogers.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 18:23, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Harry Morgan.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Harry Morgan.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 18:28, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Harry Morgan.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Harry Morgan.JPG. The copy called Image:Harry Morgan.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 18:44, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Please add image.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Please add image.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 19:39, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Bernie Mac.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Bernie Mac.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:09, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ted Henry
A tag has been placed on Ted Henry, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g12.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. ViperSnake151 21:48, 3 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Removing the speedy tag yourself is vandalism, and if you do not desist I will be forced to ask for a Request for Comments. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 16:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Harry Morgan.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Harry Morgan.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ViperSnake151 21:53, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Recreation of Deleted Pages
You should not re-create a page that has been deleted by the official deletion process. It is considered a form of vandalism. If you disagree with a deletion, please say so at Deletion review. For more information please see Deletion policy and Criteria for speedy deletion. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 22:37, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Biographies and Notability
I checked your edit history, and I notice you have submitted many articles about media persons of questionable notability. While your enthusiasm is commendable please see Notability (people) and consider more carefully whether the subject of your articles is indeed notable enough for inclusion. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 22:53, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Biography Talk Pages
There is a template you should use on the talk pages of all biographies you create.

Template:WPBiography

Just use data found there into the talk pages of all the biographies you create. That way the Wiki Project Biography can effectively rate the quality of the biographies you are constantly creating.

You might even want to consider joining the WikiProject_Biography

By the way, this is a talk page. Talk implies two way dialogue. That means you should answer at least once in a while. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 06:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

One more question
Are you User:Spotteddogsdotorg? Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 14:45, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Marla Weech
A tag has been placed on, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a. If you can indicate how Marla Weech is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Marla Weech saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 20:18, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

I deleted that article as a recreation of deleted material because we've already discussed whether there should be an article for Weech. Please see Articles for deletion/Marla Weech. Thanks.--chaser - t 21:09, 16 October 2007 (UTC)


 * It appears that one or more of those who called for the deletion of this article have been banned from Wikipedia for being sockpuppets. Had this been caught at the time, the result would have been a tie... and with my vote added for "keep" would have been kept. This needs to be revisited as Marla Weech is a notable Florida person outside of WKMG because of her environmental documentaries.  --Br it com  06:23, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

WP:AFD Process
If you disagree with a nomination for delection, the appropriate thing to do is to vote against deletion and explain your vote on the appropriate discussion page. Removing tags as you did here and here is unacceptable procedure and if you do not desist I will be forced to call an RfC on your activity. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 15:29, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello, Wtimrock, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Stifle (talk) 19:45, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

I notice you're a relatively new user here at Wikipedia and I think you might not be catching some of the customs. I advise you read the posts that people have made here - they are messages for you - and take notice of them. If you continue to upload unsourced images, recreate deleted articles, and remove article maintenance notices, you are liable to be blocked from editing. Please consider this fair warning and feel free to leave me a message at User talk:Stifle (my talk page) if you would like more information. Stifle (talk) 19:49, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

One more thing - it's not a good idea to mark all your edits as minor. Only spelling corrections or similar should be marked as minor. Stifle (talk) 19:50, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Ted Henry
A tag has been placed on, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a. If you can indicate how Ted Henry is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Ted Henry saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 03:57, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Charles H. Morgan (historian)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Charles H. Morgan (historian), and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 22:08, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I have deleted this page. Simply moving or rewording a small fraction of content doesn't fix a copyright violation. Some paragraphs were still 100% identical to the source! Please feel free to rewrite the article in your own words. &mdash; Scientizzle 15:30, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Ted Henry
A tag has been placed on, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a. If you can indicate how Ted Henry is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Ted Henry saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 14:42, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Do not recreate this article. If you believe that you've located new source material that would allow for a prospective article to meet the criticisms of Articles for deletion/Ted Henry, bring it up at deletion review. Continuing to recreate material that has been deleted through community processes can lead to a block. &mdash; Scientizzle 15:33, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Maintenance Tags
You are NOT allowed to remove maintenance tags from articles. That includes the NewsRelease tag and the CSD tag. If you disagree with the tag being on the article, you should follow the dispute resolution process described in the tags. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 14:48, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
Since you are recreating deleted material over and over, and since you have so far refused to respond to any messages I have indefinately blocked this account until you do so. Please email me so that I can explain our policies to you or request an unblock on this page so that people can talk to you. I will be happy to remove the block once you start talking to people. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 15:42, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Minor Edits
While you are improving, you should remember that you shouldn't mark everything as a Minor Edit. These three recent edits, while they appear innocuous, don't qualify as minor. ,,. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 15:17, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

While these, , are all valuable contributions, they are NOT minor edits. Please mark your edits appropriately. Please learn what a minor edit is. You are abusing the minor edit check box. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 17:26, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Thiss is not a minor edit either. Respond on your talk page please, that's what it's there for. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 22:25, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Please add image male.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Please add image male.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 20:09, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Understanding.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Understanding.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 10:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Understanding.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Understanding.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one (and vice versa) is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.'  Blake01 (talk) 19:38, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Blake01 (talk) 19:39, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Good luck with that. Wtimrock always marks edits as minor, no matter how major they are.  People have tried vainly to discuss this with him, but he ignores everyone who tries to talk to him here.  The only solution will be someday he has an RFC. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 23:29, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Date formatting
In a recent edit, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, just ask anyone on Wikipedia and they will help you. -- JD554 (talk) 08:02, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

George Bloomer
The article George Bloomer has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 21:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

December 2007
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. ''Please do not remove tags such as. Adding rumors to articles and saying they are false is not encyclopedic. Please see WP:COAT.'' Toddst1 (talk) 03:06, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

WJW-TV
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Rollosmokes (talk) 23:31, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cfnews13.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Cfnews13.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:37, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Time Warner.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Time Warner.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:27, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Adam Beason
As the author of this page you cannot remove speedy tags yourself. You must add the hangon tag if you disagree with the speedy tag. -Djsasso (talk) 18:17, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Since you have now reverted the WP:3RR rule I am going to be forced to report you since you seem to have had issues with removing tags in the past. -Djsasso (talk) 18:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Blocked for 3RR
You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bobby Womack Facts of Life.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bobby Womack Facts of Life.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:55, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:1966-1972 Cleveland Browns Logo.png
Thank you for uploading Image:1966-1972 Cleveland Browns Logo.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 07:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Flagicons
Please read Manual of Style (flags) before adding flagicons to any Wikipedia article.

I reverted your added flagicons on Bobby Womack, so specifically read Manual of Style (flags). Thank you, Aspects (talk) 03:35, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Likewise I have reverted the flagicons you added to Richard Roberts (evangelist). Gwen Gale (talk) 15:58, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


 * And I removed the flags you added to Michael Jackson. I also notice you flag all your edits as minor; please reserve the minor edit flag for genuinely tiny edits. Thanks in advance. --John (talk) 20:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Good luck with that. In spite of many people telling him that, he never responds or changes his editing patterns.  If you read this lengthy talk page, you will find absolutely zero comments from him. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 18:06, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Once again, I reverted an edit you made that added flagicons to a biography, in this case to Harry Morgan. Please read Manual of Style (flags) before adding anymore flags to biographies. Aspects (talk) 03:45, 30 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Yet again, I reverted an edit you made that added flagicons to a biography, this time Maury Povich. Please please please read Manual of Style (flags).  Aspects (talk) 23:04, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Spencer_Haywood.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Spencer_Haywood.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 01:47, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Inappropriate date formats
Looking at diffs such as Adolf Hitler and Phil Collins, I request that you return these and any other similar articles to their International Dating format, as per the Manual of Style --Pete (talk) 17:21, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

I have raised this at WP:ANI. You may wish to comment there. --Pete (talk) 08:04, 3 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Please stop doing this. It may well be annoying for editors who have chosen to put the date in the former style. Tyrenius (talk) 09:50, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jim Raley
I have nominated Jim Raley, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Jim Raley. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Black Kite 10:40, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Maureen Arthur.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Maureen Arthur.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:09, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Bobby_Womack.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bobby_Womack.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 16:53, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Maureen_Arthur.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Maureen_Arthur.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 16:55, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I also deleted some other images you uploaded as they were blatant copyright violations. Please note that when an image is publicly available on the web, it does NOT mean it is in the public domain. Garion96 (talk) 16:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Deena Duos
The article you've recreated at Deena Duos was the subject of an articles for deletion process -- see Articles for deletion/Deena_Duos_(2nd_nomination) -- which it failed. That means it's subject to immediate deletion, regardless of hangon tag, etc. The only way that you can recreate this article and have it stay in Wikipedia is if you take it through a deletion review process. If you have any questions about Wikipedia policy, you can leave me a note. Accounting4Taste: talk 15:50, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Philadelphia76ersOld.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Philadelphia76ersOld.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 02:44, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Andre Aldridge
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Andre Aldridge, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://hoopedia.nba.com/index.php/NBA_TV_Talent. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:46, 4 March 2008 (UTC)


 * D-O  N-O-T   R-E-M-O-V-E   W-A-R-N-I-N-G   T-A-G-S ! ! !  It's nice that you switched all the "prior to" phrases to "previous to", but the warning remains. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 20:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Riva Tims
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Riva Tims, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Riva Tims. -- Naerii  23:57, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Peggy Converse
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Peggy Converse, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0176592/bio. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:03, 5 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Unless you ACTUALLY make substantial changes to the article, don't remove the tags. I know the Bot said "if that is the case, you can remove the tag", but that depens on "found similarity where none actually exists."  You have a record of copyvio problems, and unless you are absolutely postively sure that you are innocent the best course of action for you is to keep your hands off of the copyvio tags. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 19:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Kenneth Copeland edit
Marty is John's wife. WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 15:49, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Judd Hambrick article
Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rollosmokes (talk) 08:47, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Cleveland Browns helmet rightface white facemask.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Cleveland Browns helmet rightface white facemask.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --00:37, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:1973-1986 Cleveland Browns Logo With Script.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:1973-1986 Cleveland Browns Logo With Script.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Browns Cap Logo 2000.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Browns Cap Logo 2000.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cleveland Browns logo.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Cleveland Browns logo.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:News8austin.png
Thanks for uploading Image:News8austin.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:57, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:RaymondAllenWoodrow.GIF
Thanks for uploading Image:RaymondAllenWoodrow.GIF. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --Fairus eBot (talk) 07:31, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

==Orphaned non-free image (Image:WayneRogersTrapperJohn.jpg)==  Thanks for uploading Image:WayneRogersTrapperJohn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Seidenstud (talk) 05:18, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jenny Jones on PYL.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jenny Jones on PYL.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

March 2009
I've reverted your edits to both the Minka and Penny Flame articles. Per WP:BLP, a reliable source must be provided for birth dates and real names, especially for people who perform under pseudonyms or stage names. And no, IMDb is not considered a reliable source for either of those pieces of information. Dismas |(talk) 04:49, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:BuddyDyer2003.png)
 Thanks for uploading Image:BuddyDyer2003.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 18:20, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Judd Hambrick.png)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Judd Hambrick.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 21:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Odessa Cleveland MASH Pilot.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Odessa Cleveland MASH Pilot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 21:46, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Wayne Rogers - Cashin' In.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Wayne Rogers - Cashin' In.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 21:48, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Leon Claire Metz
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Leon Claire Metz, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.tomlea.com/Leon_Metz. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:30, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Browns Cap Logo 2000.PNG)
 Thanks for uploading File:Browns Cap Logo 2000.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  Zoo Fari  06:20, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Chalk Mountain, Texas
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Chalk Mountain, Texas, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ghosttowns.com/states/tx/chalkmountain.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:55, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vixen LaMoore
A tag has been placed on Vixen LaMoore requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  ttonyb (talk) 07:02, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jean Afrique


The article Jean Afrique has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Makes no attempt to assert notability of the subject

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SlimVirgin talk  contribs 23:15, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ronald Kimble


The article Ronald Kimble has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links: Ronald Kimble – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Darkwind (talk) 00:09, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Thought I was clear
I thought I was clear when I directed you to create the article in your userspace and then request it be moved to the article space. Is there a reason you didn't do this? Hipocrite (talk) 21:00, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Oops!
I was unsure of how exactly to create the new article for PastorMelissa Scott because of the redirect tag placed on the original article page...so I instead created a new page with the title Melissa Scott (evangelist)...Maybe you or someone else who is an administrator can redirect the article if I recreate it to the page with the redirect tag on it...Sorry. (talk) 22 April 2010 18:16 EST (UTC)


 * I see you've created the article in your user space. Thanks. I should note that blogs/messageboards are not to be used as sources in articles. Please remove all information you can find only on blogs/messageboards. Hipocrite (talk) 12:48, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Toppsy Curvey


The article Toppsy Curvey has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:PORNBIO; no indication the subject can satisfy the GNG or any other specialized guideline; long-unsourced BLP with no assertions of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 14:52, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Toppsy Curvey
I have nominated Toppsy Curvey, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Toppsy Curvey. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. EuroPride (talk) 20:07, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:53, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rogers DeCuir


The article Rogers DeCuir has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  ttonyb (talk) 03:07, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rogers DeCuir
A tag has been placed on Rogers DeCuir requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  ttonyb (talk) 03:09, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cleveland Cavaliers 2010=11 Midcourt Logo 640x480.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:Cleveland Cavaliers 2010=11 Midcourt Logo 640x480.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cleveland Cavaliers 2010=11 Midcourt Logo 640x480.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:Cleveland Cavaliers 2010=11 Midcourt Logo 640x480.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:56, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cleveland Cavaliers 2010=11 Midcourt Logo 640x480.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:Cleveland Cavaliers 2010=11 Midcourt Logo 640x480.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zachery Tims


The article Zachery Tims has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A pastor who had an affair. Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Scott Mac 15:29, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Julia Chanel


A tag has been placed on Julia Chanel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  ttonyb (talk) 14:35, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Cameron Harper
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cameron Harper, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.teddwebb.com/showcase/where_are_they_now/cameron_harper.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:07, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Cameron Harper
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Cameron Harper, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.teddwebb.com/showcase/where_are_they_now/cameron_harper.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Cameron Harper and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Cameron Harper, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Cameron Harper with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Cameron Harper. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Cameron Harper saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 04:22, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * While not a word-for-word copy, the article remains largely a close paraphrase and needs verifiable permission from the copyright holder or rewritten in your own words. VernoWhitney (talk) 04:22, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cherokee D' Ass (pornographic actress)


The article Cherokee D' Ass (pornographic actress) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epbr123 (talk) 23:04, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cherokee D' Ass (pornographic actress)


The article Cherokee D' Ass (pornographic actress) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:24, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Copyright block
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating copyright policy by copying text into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to quote non-free text. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:40, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * You have been notified of our copyright policies and the potential for block as far back as 2007, yet you have persisted in pasting content from previously published sources with minimal or no alterations. As recently as November 10th, you pasted content into Cameron Harper from :


 * The source says:


 * You must not continue violating our copyright policy. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:40, 19 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Given your violation of our copyright policy in August with Rogers DeCuir and this in November, I have revoked your "reviewer" status. One of the criteria of a reviewer is a familiarity with copyright policy. Reviewers must be able to evaluate content to be sure it complies. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:48, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of BB Gunns


The article BB Gunns has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * One credit on IMDB... the other claims, even if true, aren't particularly establishing of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gigs (talk) 04:44, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1966-1972 Cleveland Browns Logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:1966-1972 Cleveland Browns Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:56, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cleveland Browns Temporary Helmet Logo 1965.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:Cleveland Browns Temporary Helmet Logo 1965.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:49, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cleveland Browns logo.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:Cleveland Browns logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:49, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Leah Crucet


The article Leah Crucet has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. AllyD (talk) 21:36, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeff Gardere


A tag has been placed on Jeff Gardere requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Cind. amuse  20:28, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Elke The Stallion for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elke The Stallion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Elke The Stallion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 21:42, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Copyright block
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you wish to resume editing, it may be necessary for you to demonstrate your understanding of these policies and reassure the community of your willingness to comply. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:01, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Based on your recent copying of content into William Jordan (actor) from the IMDb profile and into Elke The Stallion which both closely paraphrased and directly duplicated official sources such as this, this block seems necessary. You have yet to show any indication that you understand or intend to comply with copyright policies, which you have been violating since at least 2007. A temporary block seems not to have brought this point home to you. I am evaluating your other contributions to ensure that they are compliant with policy and have already found at least one other article, Lillie Knauls, that is also a copyright problem. If I find several more, I will be opening a WP:CCI here. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:29, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Having found additional issues both predating and postdating your last block, I have opened Contributor copyright investigations/Wtimrock to facilitate community review of copyright status of other articles. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:23, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


 * It looks like you're still incorrectly marking some of your contributions as minor edits. Your best bet on that would probably be not to mark any as minor, but instead provide appropriate edit summaries.
 * Wikifying a subject or object that is already written on the page (for instance changing apple to &#91;&#91;apple&#93;&#93; can be considered  a minor edit .
 * Fixing punctuation or spelling errors is  a minor edit .
 * Undoing obvious vandalism is  a minor edit .
 * Adding or removing links at the "See also" section of an article is  not a minor edit .
 * Adding this to an article is  not a minor edit .
 * Adding copyrighted information to Wikipedia (fair use or not) is definitely  not a minor edit .
 * Once you are ready to comply with this, you'll probably be ready to mark the correct edits as minor again. mechamind  9  0  21:02, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed | 1=I've seen instances of people vandalizine articles with profanity (I don't know if they were actually registered users) that were unchecked} without any action...Still, I have read the policies concerning copyright violations, and will try to be more careful in the future, if only someone would unblock me... | decline=Considering the fact that your edits are being investigated for further copyright violations, "[I] will try to be more careful in the future" is laughably inadequate as an unblock request. Please make it clear that you understand why you have been blocked, and describe how you will remedy the behaviour that caused you to be blocked in the first place. Closedmouth (talk) 11:47, 5 March 2011 (UTC)}}

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 21:07, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sierra (pornographic actress)


The article Sierra (pornographic actress) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Pornographic actress who satisfies neither WP:GNG nor WP:PORNBIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:09, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dave Martin (evangelist)


The article Dave Martin (evangelist) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oo7565 (talk) 04:52, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Les Feldick for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Les Feldick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Les Feldick until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pburka (talk) 02:46, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of David Demola for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Demola is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/David Demola until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wkharrisjr (talk) 20:26, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Echo Valley (actress) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Echo Valley (actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Echo Valley (actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz Humbug! 12:24, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Washington Bullets Logo 1974-1987.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Washington Bullets Logo 1974-1987.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ★ Bigr   Tex  02:39, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Files listed for discussion
Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Files for discussion/2016 August 15 if you are interested in preserving their usage. Thank you. ★ Bigr   Tex  03:30, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * File:1971-76 GS Warriors Logo.png
 * File:Golden State Warriors 1987-1995 720x540.PNG

Nomination of Jonas Max Ferris for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jonas Max Ferris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jonas Max Ferris until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &mdash; Coffee //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 09:53, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Ta-Ronce Allen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ta-Ronce Allen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ta-Ronce Allen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. sixty nine  • whaddya want? •  16:44, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Mary Dees for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mary Dees is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mary Dees until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:07, 1 February 2022 (UTC)