User talk:WusH66

JIMFBLEAK Hello Jim, we have learned that you have deleted our serious art-article about the New York artist Henry Mark – the serigraph master.The reasons mentioned in your subtitle were “ unambiguous advertising or promotion - or – no sources” …  Well, I must say, that the magnitude of this accusation is heavy indeed. Such an accusation is ridiculous and in fact an insult to a professional. In 40 years time as foreign correspondent, not a single publisher has ever accused me of doing hidden commercials or promotion for anyone. On the contrary, this is a matter of ethics, as you know. And so is the matter of research and correct sources. My wife is ex-New Yorker, she lived there for a considerable number of years and was most up to date with the US art world. Nobody doubts her expertise. Since very little was documented about Henry Mark, she decided to deliver a well researched article for the benefit of the Wikipedia readers. For that reason my wife has been in touch with the museums and institutions mentioned ,and invested a lot of time to bring up a scientific and profound article. So far we only found contributions in Wikipedia from the Brooklyn Museum ( collections and exhibitions). If you read our article carefully, you will find a listing of numerous US institutions as serious sources. So that can not be the reason for being deleted either. We must have it distinctly understood that there were no “unambiguous advertising or promotion - or – no sources” mentioned, and therefore no reason to delete this article at all. We wonder how you will differentiate between the values of these objects ? What expertise in this field do you put up against a very well researched article ? We might be ignorant of the rules of the Wikipedia layout game, though. We can understand that our article, maybe, must be formatted according to the Wikipedia layout standards. We regret, that we have very little time at our disposal for such work and will not be able to fulfill such a demand from Wikipedia. As usual, we have produced the article in good faith; every publisher has his own way of editing an article and designing his layout of it. We expect the same thing with Wikipedia. So we herewith ask for your help to make our article wikified. No other contribution from our side is planned, just this one about Henry Mark, the serigraph master. For this reason we will deliver our article again, and hope that you will find the correct Wikipedia input and submit our article into Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.: HENRY MARK “The American silkscreen and serigraph master” Thank you in advance. Regards WusH66.

Speedy deletion nomination of Henry Mark


A tag has been placed on Henry Mark, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the page that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hairhorn (talk) 19:34, 29 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, regarding your note on my page (please use the talk page next time), I think you may have misunderstood some of the goals of Wikipedia. Henry Mark looks more like a promotional essay, and presents a particular point of view. You may want to look at No original research and Neutral point of view for more. Also, Wiki does not write in a journalistic style, Wiki is not a "publisher", see WP:NOT. Cheers. Hairhorn (talk) 19:58, 29 May 2012 (UTC)