User talk:Wuyuansheng

Nomination of Creating Effect of Arabidopsis thaliana SCPL41 Gene on the Expression of Key Genes Involved in Drought Stress for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Creating Effect of Arabidopsis thaliana SCPL41 Gene on the Expression of Key Genes Involved in Drought Stress is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Creating Effect of Arabidopsis thaliana SCPL41 Gene on the Expression of Key Genes Involved in Drought Stress until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 04:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Creating Effect of Arabidopsis thaliana SCPL41 Gene on the Expression of Key Genes Involved in Drought Stress


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Creating Effect of Arabidopsis thaliana SCPL41 Gene on the Expression of Key Genes Involved in Drought Stress, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Arabidopsis thaliana. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Arabidopsis thaliana, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
 * It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Blythwood (talk) 04:25, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Wuyuansheng, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 01:22, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Cucumber in Sauce


A tag has been placed on Cucumber in Sauce, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 14:30, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The function and mechanism of SCPL41 gene during drought stress in Arabidopsis
Hello, Wuyuansheng. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, The function and mechanism of SCPL41 gene during drought stress in Arabidopsis, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Fbergo (talk) 14:56, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Effects of Different Treatments on Seed Germination Characteristics of Stipa purpurea
Hello, Wuyuansheng. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Effects of Different Treatments on Seed Germination Characteristics of Stipa purpurea, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Fbergo (talk) 14:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Cucumber in Sauce for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cucumber in Sauce is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cucumber in Sauce until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 15:31, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Is Becoming Rich the Only Goal of Life?


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Is Becoming Rich the Only Goal of Life?. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Materialism. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Materialism – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. McGeddon (talk) 12:44, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 12:44, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, In recent years, the development of golf in China


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, In recent years, the development of golf in China. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Golf in China. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Golf in China – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:20, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Problems with your editing
Unfortunately, none of the articles you have created has been at all suitable for Wikipedia, for a number of reasons, including the following: they have not been written in the style that is considered appropriate for Wikipedia; they have lacked references to suitable sources; they have lacked sufficient context (for example, you have started writing about "the study" without saying what study you are referring to); most of them have appeared to be original research, and at least one seemed to be a personal essay, expressing personal opinions. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. However, in your case there is also another consideration. I found part of the contents of one of the articles you created in the abstract of a published research paper, which raised the question of whether you may have been copying contents of published papers to Wikipedia, in which case you have been infringing copyright. Also, one of your articles which did not look like a research paper was not written in coherent English. The contrast between the standard of English in that article and the standard in other articles is another reason for thinking you may have been copying content from elsewhere. If you have done so, then you must not continue to do so. Also, if the standard of English in the article about golf is a true indication of your ability in the English language, then editing an English language encyclopaedia is probably not something you should be doing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:03, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Effects of Reclaimed Water on Physiology and Morphology of Turf Grass in Kunming Golf Course


A tag has been placed on Effects of Reclaimed Water on Physiology and Morphology of Turf Grass in Kunming Golf Course requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JMHamo (talk) 23:07, 29 October 2016 (UTC)