User talk:Wweisawesomenes

June 2016
Hello, I'm HitroMilanese. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Extreme Rules (2016) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hitro  talk  15:56, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bash at the Beach (2016)


A tag has been placed on Bash at the Beach (2016), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. red dogsix (talk) 16:28, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Royal Rumble (2008). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:28, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Royal Rumble (2008) was changed by Wweisawesomenes (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.943492 on 2016-06-18T14:28:47+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at No Way Out (2008), you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: No Way Out (2008) was changed by Wweisawesomenes (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.903011 on 2016-06-18T14:50:16+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:50, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Wweisawesomenes, you are invited to the Teahouse!
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 03:20, 19 June 2016 (UTC)