User talk:Wweseabury

Welcome!
Hello, Wweseabury, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Getting started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

March 2014
Hello, I'm NiciVampireHeart. An edit that you recently made to Rey Mysterio seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Nici Vampire  Heart  20:07, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jake 69


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Jake 69 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. §everal⇒|Times 20:12, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jake 69


A tag has been placed on Jake 69, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NHCLS (talk) 20:42, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

About deletion
Hey, Wweseabury, I wanted to go into a little more depth about why I ended up deleting Jake 69. While I understand that you want to let your fans know about your console, that's just not what Wikipedia is for. Wikipedia aims to only discuss things that are notable, and notability in the context of Wikipedia usually means that a subject must have been discussed in some depth by multiple reliable sources before it can have an article written about it. We have this rule in place because it allows us to be sure that we can write verifiably about the subject; if a subject isn't notable, there most likely won't be anything we can write about while sticking to our fundamental principle of verifiability. So, while I appreciate your desire, the article you wrote just wasn't the kind of thing that Wikipedia accepts. It's not a huge deal, really; mistakes like this are quite common among new editors. If you'd like to try to contribute to Wikipedia on other subjects (and I totally understand if you don't), you'd be welcome. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page; another great place to ask questions is at the Teahouse. Thanks for trying to improve Wikipedia! Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 21:11, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Rey Mysterio2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rey Mysterio2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:50, 28 March 2014 (UTC)