User talk:Wwjx0p

Welcome!

Hello, Wwjx0p, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Wwjx0p, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Wuh Wuz  Dat  16:01, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Wwjx0p


A tag has been placed on User:Wwjx0p, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Wuh Wuz  Dat  16:01, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ebiquity


A tag has been placed on Ebiquity, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Bk314159 (Talk to me and find out what I've done) 21:48, 22 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi there! I didn't nominate your page for speedy deletion, the editor above did. However, you can't remove the tag yourself, which is why I reinstated it. The tag attracts the attention of an administrator who will review the article according to the guidelines at WP:CSD. The company could well be WP:Notable, but most of the references seem to be to the corporate website. For reasons of verifiability, references to independent secondary sources are preferred. A good guide is available at WP:FIRSTARTICLE. Bigger digger (talk) 12:35, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Syrthiss (talk) 12:38, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Ebiquity?
-- Bk314159 (Talk to me and find out what I've done) 16:06, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Ebiquity pt2
Bigger digger (talk) 21:04, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * And another one. Bigger digger (talk) 19:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Ebiquity for deletion
I did advise that the article was clearly not ready for being in articlespace. As such, a discussion has begun about whether the article Ebiquity, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ebiquity until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 10:10, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi,

The article is about a well known international company who have offices around the world and are listed on the London stock exchange. Regarding notability, they often generate news interest beyond passing mention or reference as a source. In fact they have been the main focus of news stories from well know international news and media channels such as The Financial Times and Campaign. As the news channels that offer the more detailed analysis have put content behind pay walls it has reduced the amount of references available that everyone can see. People from around the world who read publications like The Financial Times, The Independent and Telegraph who have combined circulation of over a million would have at some point have heard of Ebiquity.

The original user who moved the article to their user space agreed Ebiquity is a valid subject to have an individual page but wrote that it needed to be edited, before moving it back over I rewrote the article and removed the content I could not find independent references for. The user has kindly offered to edit the article to make it move wikipedia friendly and useful for people wishing to research a well known company they may want to find out about.

Can you hold off deleting it so we can turn it into something useful? Wwjx0p (talk) 14:46, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Ebiquity Logo.png
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 22:12, 30 October 2018 (UTC)