User talk:Wwmbes

Diffkit
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Diffkit, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.diffkit.org.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:32, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Diffkit


A tag has been placed on Diffkit, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ravendrop (talk) 05:46, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Diffkit
Ok, thanks, I understand. Any chance of the following: 1) Can I get the article back? 2) Can we build these constraints into the capture screen and the submission process, so that we can avoid this situation from the get-go? Wwmbes (talk) 12:30, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your message.

Your best bet when writing an article is to find reliable sources and write the article based on what others have written about the subject.

In this instance, you wrote a short article that included a long list of software features. Without any sources, that sort of article is usually considered to be promotional. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:10, 8 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I've restored the article and moved it to User:Wwmbes/Diffkit. When you've finished your work on it, you can move it back to Diffkit by following the instructions at WP:Moving a page.
 * As far as changing the submission process, that's above my pay grade. You might want to start a discussion at the WP:Village pump about it. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

July 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=615829253 your edit] to Data may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:37, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * * Until the advent of [Non-volatile memory|non-volatile computer memories] like USB sticks, persistent
 * layer|layer of abstraction]] for persistent data storage. Databases use meta data, and a [SQL|structured query language] protocol between client and server systems,

Disambiguation link notification for July 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Data (computing), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Index. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

August 2016
Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to Helm Roos. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this: SomeImage.jpg, instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do: SomeImage.jpg. There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:57, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aubit-4GL


The article Aubit-4GL has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails GNG unable to find sources about product on Google, scholar or news."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Whispe ring  23:14, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Commitment control


The article Commitment control has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unreferenced article with ambiguous title."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 18:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Commitment control for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Commitment control is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Commitment control until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Boleyn (talk) 18:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)