User talk:Wwoods/Archive 2015

Nomination of Langdon K. Fieberling for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Langdon K. Fieberling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Langdon K. Fieberling until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:43, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Moving Burma to Myanmar - new 2015 poll
You participated in a Burma RM in the past so I'm informing you of another RM. I hope I didn't miss anyone. New move attempt of Burma>Myanmar Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:12, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Edward W. Gosselin


A tag has been placed on Edward W. Gosselin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Rob Sinden (talk) 12:30, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Edward W. Gosselin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edward W. Gosselin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Edward W. Gosselin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:59, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

USS Anthony
Hello Wwoods, 10 years ago you added the lines about USS Green here. Do you have any reference for this. I would like to add it here and the german version. Yours --Baumfreund-FFM (talk) 17:14, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Anthony (Destroyer No. 266), a Cfewson[sic]-class destroyer, was laid down on 3 June 1918 at Squantum, Mass., by the Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., but was renamed Greene (q.v.) on 1 August 1918, three months prior to her launching.
 * http://www.history.navy.mil/research/histories/ship-histories/danfs/a/anthony-ii.html
 * —WWoods (talk) 13:46, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot.
 * Yours --Baumfreund-FFM (talk) 03:41, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Diagrams
Hi Wwoods, fwiw, you might be interested in the following: and. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 16:53, 13 December 2015 (UTC)