User talk:Wyandanch

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark M. Spradley


A tag has been placed on Mark M. Spradley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. JoeSperrazza (talk) 15:12, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Wyandanch for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoeSperrazza (talk • contribs) 15:21, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mark M. Spradley


The article Mark M. Spradley has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Lack of verifable notability, puff piece by Single purpose Socks

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoeSperrazza (talk) 22:41, 4 January 2011 (UTC)


 * You've yet to respond to this notice for Mark M. Spradley, nor to the prior "Speedy Deletion" notice. The article has been tagged showing where it needs improvement. If you can update the article to improve it, wonderful. Otherwise, it is likely to be deleted. JoeSperrazza (talk) 16:55, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Mark M. Spradley, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. JoeSperrazza (talk) 17:09, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Apparent Conflict of Interest
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Mark M. Spradley, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Your user name, and that of your suspected WP:SOCKPUPPET (see Sockpuppet_investigations/Wyandanch) is the same as the name of the town in which the subject of your article attended, and the same as the name as the school the article at one point said he spoke at (and presumably attended). JoeSperrazza (talk) 17:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC)