User talk:Wynn williams

Your edits to Pilgrims' Way
Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I have reverted your changes to the "fictitious" Pilgrims' Way, partly because the markup was broken, making parts of the page virtually unreadable, and partly because many of the additions seemed to be point of view pushing. Your suggestion that the true route was the "A25" is interesting and well worth including, but contrary material (including one of the four supporting references) shouldn't be deleted willy-nilly. Above all, the new material should be offered in a neutral fashion and fully supported by citations and references. Terms such as "so-called" and "fictitious" need to be used very sparingly, if at all, and fully justified. The editors to date have, between them, achieved a balanced view of what is likely to be true and what is fiction: the goal is to describe and record the different theories, rather than discard the ones that one editor may disagree with.

I look forward to seeing more on the "A25" suggestions in due course, but with good sources. You may like to consider introducing them first on the talk page first.

All the best. --Old Moonraker (talk) 07:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)