User talk:Wynter1200/sandbox/Cupid (Michelangelo)

In the lead section, the first sentence begins to talk about the sculpture, and then quickly turns to talking about the artist, and so reading it can feel a bit difficult. Maybe revising the pronoun usage can help it sound smoother?

The structure of the article makes sense, though the section for similar sections is currently rather short. It makes sense, if you still plan to add other similar works, but if there are no more similar works, then maybe that fact can be incorporated with one of the other sections.

Maybe adding any interpretations into their own section, would help the viewers see the various perspectives that can be gathered from this piece.

The content is rather neutral. There are a few instances where a statement, which also seems to be a fact, is said without much explanation, which may occasionally be beneficial.

The sources are reliable, as many are a result from ivy league research sources.