User talk:Wyozrpm

Problems with upload of File:Google drive screenshot.png
Thanks for uploading File:Google drive screenshot.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Google drive screenshot.png
Thanks for uploading File:Google drive screenshot.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fleet Command (talk) 16:22, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Google drive screenshot.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Google drive screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:23, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

WP:NOTCENSORED
"Wikipedia may contain content that some readers consider objectionable or offensive—​even exceedingly so. Attempting to ensure that articles and images will be acceptable to all readers, or will adhere to general social or religious norms, is incompatible with the purposes of an encyclopedia."

This is a policy and is never likely to change. Please do not remove material based on its potential to offend. Thanks.  Jolly  Ω   Janner  19:34, 16 January 2016 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 21:09, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Anonymous 173. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article GitLab, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 16:50, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Just for the record, I do NOT have a conflict of interest regarding GitLab

December 2016
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 17:00, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to GitLab, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 13:46, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Why have you put the conflict of interest template on the GitLab article? And what gives you the right to say I am wrong.
 * Seven of the sources are to the companies website. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, which summarises what independent sources have published about subjects and has essentially no interest in what anybody or any organisation says or wants to say about themselves, but is only interested in summarising what independent people have published about a subject. Theroadislong (talk) 14:14, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

The conflict of interest template should ONLY be used when a contributor that has a close connection to the subject makes edits. This has not happened, so why have you added this template? And the Primary sources template is only to be used when the article has more primary sources than any other types of sources, this is also not the case. so why have you added this template? - Consider removing both of them.